That would be a constitutional coup. The reason we put the date there is to ensure we have predictable day. Let election go on. If NASA fears are confirmed and election are not fair or free - then I expect NASA to ran to Supreme Court - and have it annualed - and we can go for another election.
Judiciary should never be allowed to become the law unto themselves esp on matters written in plain english that there shall be election on 8.8.2017.
We know the NASA game plan - postphone election then create constitutional crisis - where parliament has been dissolved -and you have PORK out there doing that is strung up - and then we hear care-taker or nusu mkate transitional gok.
Pundit, postponing an election by a few weeks is not a "coup" by any stretch of the imagination. You are sure Jubilee has this in the bag, so why resist the reforms? Let everything appear above par then when Jubilee stomps through with 55 or 60 or 70% there will be no ability to shout foul.
The truth is, its the nature of the system. Supreme Courts do that all the time; pull laws out of a magic hat and they become the binding law of the land. That's how the US can discover a right to gay marriage in 2015, 200 years after the document was penned by politicians and a population that were surely homophobic, 100% guaranteed
I thought their decisions in the 2013 case were all BS but had to accept and move on.
The constitution can be interpreted as a whole or in a literal manner, and the truth is, for good or ill, the law of the land is whatever the top court wants it to be, not what is written there. That's why Dems and Reps desperately fight over the right to appoint the next SCOTUS members in the US. There are many people who decide to vote one way or the other solely based on the ability to predict how the judges chosen by a Rep or Dem president will vote in an important case. I guess its a weird kind of democracy... if at all. What they have that we dont have is a discernible ideology and judicial philosophies that allow these predictions. In Kenya, I think tribe maybe an indicator in politically important decisions but I don't know. I only read that one decision and that was eons ago. But the problem you raise is present in many places. Its just how this system works. And the Courts over time, at least in common law countries with written constitutions, have a tendency to give themselves more and more powers over time.
You see, Pundit, y'all should have gone with the parliamentary system that RAO suggested after all, and not tried to copy Americanism in Kenya.