Noway, this is why I'm on the fence till investigations. Videos and 'evidence' vs Counter videos and 'evidence.' Let people with requisite qualifications and office, people who KNOW how to sort these things (forensics experts, people who would analyze these videos for authenticity and details, etc), tell us which is which, after adequate opportunity to examine the scene, bodies, witnesses, etc, for themselves. Not, as I'm reading, a team of prosecutors from Ukraine and other countries already hostile to Russia. A UN team will eventually have hearings to collect information from all these Western-side investigators, alongside whatever Russian experts are coming from the opposite end, in addition to their own independent studies. Results may not be perfect but I'm inclined to go with them over what the West says while acting all by their lonesome. Maybe this team can consist of people from Scandinavia, China, India, and Turkey, plus Ukrainian/Russian people, to avoid accusations of bias, etc.
(Btw, that video of Ukrainian officers asking and apparently getting permission to shoot civilians for not wearing the Blue insgnia, is what I was referring to yesterday when I said it's just as possible some of these bodies may be victims of execution for perceived treason by Ukrainian officers as they may be victims of Russian officers: In wartime, horrors happen, and this is likely for both camps. So let the investigations happen.)
