Author Topic: kenyaplato's Intel Briefs  (Read 7273 times)

Offline Garliv

  • Mega superstar
  • *
  • Posts: 419
  • Reputation: 0
Re: kenyaplato's Intel Briefs
« Reply #40 on: January 29, 2020, 07:05:04 PM »
Those 2 solar minimums answers a lot of Climate Change Alarmists. They state by this and this year UK will be swallowed by oceans (actually they had predicted as much). Or by this year this will have happened or temperatures will have risen by ao much degrees. So yes, scientifically determined 2 solar minimums is fair and adequate answer.



I understood you to mean that the next 2 solar minimums are an argument against global warming due to CO2.  That is what I understood you to say and is what I am saying is at best

Why?  Because while CO2 may warm up the earth, it is not the only factor.  Looked at in another way, those solar minimums would be cooler were CO2 levels lower.  Also because the global warming is long term, we cannot rely on short term effects of things like solar minimums to dismiss it.

Offline Kim Jong-Un's Pajama Pants

  • Moderator
  • Enigma
  • *
  • Posts: 8784
  • Reputation: 106254
  • An oryctolagus cuniculus is feeding on my couch
Re: kenyaplato's Intel Briefs
« Reply #41 on: January 29, 2020, 07:11:40 PM »
There is lots of research that CO2 is not some kind of control knob for Global temperatures. It may contribute insignificantly but it isn't the control knob.

CO2 output from human activity may have increased over time but that doesn't mean anything much about global temperatures. Check NASA satellite data which identified most CO2 produced in Amazon tropics, African jungles. Available on their website or just Google.

You are conflating most CO2 production with increasing CO2.  It's not the same thing.

Indeed a Finnish Study and confirmed by Japanese University Kobe concluded cloud cover may raise temperature significantly but not CO2.

https://cornwallalliance.org/2012/12/carbon-dioxide-and-air-temperature-who-leads-and-who-follows/

Sun, earth orbit, volcanoes, magnetic field etc may all be responsible for climate change but what Climate Alarmists want to scare humans that they are CHIEFLY responsible for global climate change which will VERY SOON AND IMMINENTLY kill all of us. Total BS. They want people not to eat meat, not to drill oil, not to drive cars, to shut down industries, to slaughter all cows, not to fly etc etc. And its all based on spurious and baseless hoax science. That's what at issue.

No time to look through that.  Maybe later.  But any suggestion that CO2 is not a greenhouse gas is not convincing.  You don't even have to know about the planet Venus to understand this.
"I freed a thousand slaves.  I could have freed a thousand more if only they knew they were slaves."

Harriet Tubman

Offline Arcadian_Dreamer

  • VIP
  • Enigma
  • *
  • Posts: 1559
  • Reputation: 0
  • Life is a mistake
Re: kenyaplato's Intel Briefs
« Reply #42 on: January 29, 2020, 10:07:21 PM »
They are some ngombes who doubt humans are causing climate change?! Why not doubt humans are behind the massive deforestation, desertification due to loss of topsoil from poor farming practices, air pollution, extinction of species due to poaching and habitat loss, resource depletion, etc. Just wash hands of responsibility for that too. Yes, man has not contributed to that too. Pollution was magically present in the past too you know, naturally. Nincompoops.

Sleep is good, death is better; but of course, The best would be never to have been born at all.

Offline GeeMail

  • VIP
  • Enigma
  • *
  • Posts: 2722
  • Reputation: 18465
Re: kenyaplato's Intel Briefs
« Reply #43 on: January 29, 2020, 10:42:25 PM »
Cloud cover or water vapour responsible for climate change which really are long-term weather changes, much more than CO2. Since it is impossible to stop the sun shining and causing water evaporation to form clouds, Mr Francis and his nutcase scientist followers drooling for cash have chosen the easiest victim, CO2. It's like Waititu hammering a Kiambu sweeper for his impeachment simply because he can't reach State House. They claim manmade climate change can be reversed by reducing CO2 emissions to a certain arbitrary level and using "consensus" to arrive at scientific conclusions. Seriously? Mr Francis is following in the footsteps of Mr John Paul who wrote Dies Domini in an attempt to justify a global sabbath (Sunday) using the true Bible Sabbath (Saturday) as the template. Read what Dies Domini says about the Sabbath as well as what Mr Francis says about it (Laudato Si, Article 237) and the bigger picture emerges. Bait with environment and switch to Sunday before people notice. Who would have imagined that real living scientists would line up behind a pope to proclaim their scientific madnesses? It is happening live! This manmade climate change hoax is like a nightmare but nobody can stop a pope with money and nutcases behind him. There are very dark forces behind the whole thing and they must be allowed to run the show for a time so that their madness may be fully exposed. The show must go on!
Celebratory violence: 2017 crime invented to justify killings to prevent Raila from becoming PORK. http://www.nipate.com/download/file.php?id=4244