We want corruption fought and won...but we cannot allow suspension of someone elected by 1m to be suspended by some magistrate or some DPP to rush cases so governor can step aside.MCA can impeach Waitutu with even lower threshold. If Ruto became pork now...say Uhuru dies...will you be happy if the shoe was on the other foot.
Yes in fact I would - fighting corruption is welcome from all quarters - like really
. These people are merely on trial - with busloads of lawyers - not detained. Poor Wanjiku is lucky to have a vengeful Uhuru in her corner. However my key reason for opposing Ruto is his wanton unscrupulousness so perish the thought. I do reiterate you have Stockholm syndrome - this is not even blind loyalty - 50+% tax then you side with thieves?
Elected officials can never equal to appointed.never.here.or even in the us.That is why Trump is potus
Trump is not on trial - has immunity - so your question is moot. Even so, Mueller's is a quasi-judicial inquiry - not a trial - appointed by the DoJ. It is the equivalent of Kenyan DPP appointing someone to probe and issue a report on a case - which could be used to file charges. Courts and judges try people - not prosecutors. Alas, Trump was exonerated.
Elected officials can never equal to appointed.never.here.or even in the us.
If we had impeachments of Ojaamongs for graft - or some modicum of honesty by MPs and MCAs - I would agree with you. But what happens instead? - the governors bribe the senators to cover them - so yes the DPP and the courts are 100% right to effectively suspend them. It is why we have 3 co-equal arms of government - to check and balance each other - including where the oversight is mired in graft, incompetence and/or misplaced loyalties.
That is the spirit of the Katiba 2010.