Pundit
If you had a method that was consistent and which can be replicated and used by anybody I could think differently.
You system lacks in all those qualities (listed above generally). It is erratic and highly subjective. There is no explanation why a value/ practice employed in one scenario / situation is not being so employed in an exact same scenario elsewhere. It is in short topsyturvy!
Above all - and most crucial for me - is the clear perception that you first agreed on the final figures with Uhuru placed at 53% and then proceeded prepared your MOAS. For the final figure to remain 53% it is obvious that you have to add and subtract and divide and twist until the "desired" result remains intact.
My evidence and disgust came on the same day. When you posted the very first one and I asked if you were sure of it and you affirmed. However once a the figures were properly added and the zones / strongholds properly attributed, with NASA in a commanding lead, you "withdrew" the MOAS and declared that it was incomplete!
I therefore paid little attention to the subsequent "amended" MOAS.
It is a good working document for a person who seeks to start understanding Kenyan politics. But for those of us already on top of things, that is a clear piece of propaganda because I am not about to buy the apparent WILFUL stupidity.
On the other hand you could be falling victim to the propaganda of your own party and your surroundings. I sit around JP people and have to often conceal anger, frustration, laughter and all. I am usually grateful when it is all over and I have to take my leave. There is frankly a disconnect between wishful thinking and reality; The use of draconian powers and the use of democratic powers of persuasion.
I hear such things like we shall win come what may and the speaker somehow still imagines stealing an election is not undemocratic as long as Uhuru is "delivering" and Laira will give chang'aa to kids...