1) Bottom up model boost the LOCAL economy while reducing corruption - because procurement for maize and beans - will happen in headmaster offices. SO that 30B if it was left in Nairobi - Duale would have taken part of it - but if it dispersed to 25,000 primary schools - Duale will not. The economy will remain the same - but now at least pie will spread to the guys at bottom. No few Kenyatta trillionaires...everyone will get something.
2) To really grow the economy and provide jobs - it may sound counter-intuitive - but you do the opposite of "common" sense - you focus on exporting - this is what South Asians did (South Korea, Japan, Hong Kong, China, name them). Now Veitnam and Bangladesh are doing it. These countries have grown by doing opposite of common sense - that IMF/WB were recommending - because they were smart enough to realize developed countries where throwing the economic ladder down after using it.Ohoo fix the local economy. YOU CANNOT MANUFACTURE FOR POOR PEOPLE - that cannot afford three square meals.
3)
Veitnam now export value is more than it's GDP. They export more goods than the local economy. It's a paradox!. Local poor economy even if you make it very efficient has it's limit. You have to grow exports use the excess labour. Your use export proceeds to grow the economy. When domestic economy is strong enough -now you switch to local economy. Veitnam is at stage 1. China is moving to stage 2 (restructuring from exports to domestic economy). Japan is in stage 3 (they can survive with local economy as japanase are rich now).
4) In transitioning you have to be careful - not to kill the economy in the process - from export back to domestic - you have to bring the dollars slowly - otherwise you will overheat the local economy - as many Asian financial crisis showed. This is why China have not been hurry to bring money home - they have invested outside china - to avoid overheating china with wave of new money (can cause dutch or nigeria curse - new oil money - everyone gets drunk). They are now re-hatting or restructuring - and building domestic consumption capacity.
5) Kenya has to do local economy (bottom up) - and with excess labour (now maybe 5M jobless people who are neither farmers) - we need to do EPZ - light manufacturing that employ lots of labour - stitch clothes for sale abroad - toys - stuff like those
Isn't this the fundamental problem with African economies? We make nothing that is worth exporting. It's all about getting a corrupt government tender and becoming a supplier. This cannot continue to work especially as the population keeps getting larger. At a minimum, Africans need to start manufacturing at least for the local East African Market and then expand from their.
This is what has gotten Sri Lanka into trouble (too many imports and not enough local manufacturing)
And firewood? Seriously? cutting down more trees? how is this even viable?