Typical fool.
in 2007 - police were distributed nationally- it didn't help at all.
In fact - what happened was ODM leaning tribal police - would back the ODM gangs - the PNU would be shooting to kill - all of them pretending to be non-tribal.
Now if they were all from local area - the pressure on them to act non-tribally would be immense. If they misuse fire-arms they will be held to account.
They wont be hidding under the cover - like in 2007 - where I heard the Kalenjin-Luo-Luhyha police would tell warriors - endelea na kazi - while pretending to be opening the roads.
Eventually in Nakuru - the tribal police started shouting themselves - everyone claiming unaua watu wetu- and the army had to come in.
Nobody ever took responsibility for that - because well the police had all tribes.
We need to face our demons...live live...
Now PEV is something that happens maybe even 15yrs...but policing is daily affair.
You can mitigate the risk of tribal police going ethiopia kind of mess by downgrading the weapons they can carry...if they get armed only with pistols...that enough to police people.
And only policing that works is local police policing local people.
We had so-called national GSU and Army during the 2007/8 post-election violence. Yet you saw how useless they were in protecting victims. Some people were able to camp out in police stations precisely because they were viewed as non-tribal places. Imagine if the police stations were run by the tribes committing the violence. Would they have been seen as safe havens? I don't think so. If a church could not be a safe haven in Ruto's own constituency, how then would a police station, manned by his tribesmen, would have helped? Maybe the police officers themselves would have been the perpetrators of the violence. In any case, if the present is any indication, maybe a good number of the police in Ruto's area would be preoccupied with guarding his loot, rather than protecting the poor hustlers he claims to love. Stop playing "punditry" games with us.