A high court judge in Nakuru has found they are prima-facia wild. Secondly it really JSC to determine the weight of any allegation.
And as for us 1) JSC has confirmed Uhuru never gave them evidence the last 24 months 2) The list has changed - with addition and removal
Secondly two former CJ have said the same and 3) The list is almost exclusive to judges that have been high court division of human rights and constitutions with history of ruling against gov.
Thirdly we know Uhuru made these appointments because he was desperate for bench for BBI appeal.
This court order therefore put more brakes on his brand new select judges from being in BBI appeal - and it possible Musinga will not get a 7 bench soon...so more BBI waiting time.
Finally if this is allowed to go; the next president will be selecting who to appoint or not appoint; thereby ammending the Katiba.
JSC list will now be a suggestion - with final pick coming from Harambee house. If judge has been ruling against gov - Harambee house can manufacture fitina.
Way forward. Appoint all of them. Channel fitina to JSC. If they have merit - JSC will start tribunal.
How can we know Uhuru's allegations are "wild" before they are tabled?