The theory of the rise of these lakes i saw on stst paper is that the tectonic shifts are happening slowly and frequent.
Not true! The rise of water levels in lakes and rivers mostly has to do with bare soil and the malfunctioning water cycle that results from it.
In seasonally arid or brittle environments -- which cover two-thirds of the earth's land area -- soil cover is essential to the biodiversity (including biomass) and complexity that is needed for the soil to gain and store water, which is a basic necessity for all life.
Healthy soils essentially act like sponges that hold in rainwater and store it for plants. If the soil is bare or mostly bare then ANY rain that falls invariably becomes a flood. You see that increasingly around the world. People think it is climate change, but it isn't.
Record rainfall is usually cited as a cause of severe flooding in recent years. What if the land, the soil of a large watershed were to decrease, in its content of organic matter and cover of plant material, by 1 or 2 percent? What would this mean to the severity and frequency of floods and droughts?