Mwilu (DCJ) arrest - nothing more than a revisit.

[RV Pundit]

• Tweet

This new Uhuru's NIS-DCI-DPP led graft war is intriguing. Occasionally EACC tries to remain relevant as this is their domain and bring in their files like Ruaraka - but ultimately NIS which has dirt on everyone - are picking their big fish selectively.

Somebody had to pay for corrupt decision of Supreme Court to annual Uhuru's election.

[Kim Jong-Un's Pajama Pants]

Can you point out which part of the SCORK decision was influenced by corruption?

[RV Pundit]

Mwilu being a secret wife of Amos Wako - with kids nonetheless - NASA Senator and Chief Counsel is corruption.She should have recused herself but she actively assisted NASA. That why she is now at DCI and will be facing criminal charges. Also Registry Discrepancy Report was Corrupt. Njoki actually sat down and went through the so called Registry Discrepancy Report and was shocked to find nothing like that from the original forms she checked. You just need to read Njoki separate dissenting opinion to understand how Mwilu influenced and engineered together with Orengo & Wako the process. Uhuru and NIS of course knows everything. And this is just part of the revisiting.

Can you point out which part of the SCORK decision was influenced by corruption?

[Kim Jong-Un's Pajama Pants]

Mwilu being a secret wife of Amos Wako - NASA Senator and Chief Counsel is corruption. That why she is now at DCI. Also Regirstry Report was Corrupt. Njoki actually sat down and went through the so called Registry Discrepancy Report and was shocked to find nothing like that from the original forms he checked.

Can you point out which part of the SCORK decision was influenced by corruption?

I am having internet issues.  Put put some supporting citations and I'll be happy to look at them when internet cooperates.

[RV Pundit]

Citation on Mwilu having an affair & kids with Amos Wako and close dealing with Prof OJienda - Key ODM planks   or you want me to quote Njoki meticulous demolition of so called discrepancy report prepared by Chief Registar.  Njoki went through original forms - and found out - where registry said it was not signed or bla bla bla - almost always it was not correct. It obvious somebody corrupted the verification process overseen by Chief Registar - romours was NASA did this - using watchmen at Annivissary Towers to replace genuine forms with fake forms.

Here is Njoki's dissenting opinion - Start from page 278

https://www.theelephant.info/uploads/2017/09/Dissenting-Opinion-Njoki-SCJ.pdf

I am having internet issues.  Put put some supporting citations and I'll be happy to look at them when internet cooperates.

[Kadudu]

Pundit, where does Prof. Ojienda come in this mix? I did not see him with the DCJ on the dock.

[RV Pundit]

My mistake - there is another lawyer she is been charged with.

Pundit, where does Prof. Ojienda come in this mix? I did not see him with the DCJ on the dock.

[RV Pundit]

Shamelessly NASA TOP LAWYERS defending Mwilu. She has no tact. She probably want to have Raila intervene on behalf of handshake .

Judge Mwilu was represented by lawyers John Khaminwa, James Orengo, Okongo Omogeni, Daniel Maanzo, Julie Soweto, Millie Odhiambo, Peter Kaluma, Anthony Oluoch and Mutula Kilonzo Jnr

[patel]

this is more of CJ succession battle than anything else. Off course Jubileediots would be very uncomfortable with Mwilu in the helm.
Recuse? why didn't Njoki Ndungu recuse herself after its been pointed out time and again she sleeps with murathe and Muhoho

[vooke]

Why did DPP skip JSC unlike Tunoi's similar case?

Is that why they threw in KRA?

I think Mwilu is clean as a whistle and this will be the most embarrassing moment of Uhuru's second term.

[Kadudu]

Even people accused of worse crimes like crimes against humanity have the right to have accredited lawyers to defend them.

Shamelessly NASA TOP LAWYERS defending Mwilu. She has no tact. She probably want to have Raila intervene on behalf of handshake .

Judge Mwilu was represented by lawyers John Khaminwa, James Orengo, Okongo Omogeni, Daniel Maanzo, Julie Soweto, Millie Odhiambo, Peter Kaluma, Anthony Oluoch and Mutula Kilonzo Jnr

[RV Pundit]

I know but she vindicates Jubilee - that was not a fair referee - but a player in the last election. I guess she figures out - she if finished either way.

Even people accused of worse crimes like crimes against humanity have the right to have accredited lawyers to defend them.

[RV Pundit]

There are very few clean people around. And there is a season for everything.

Why did DPP skip JSC unlike Tunoi's similar case?

Is that why they threw in KRA?

I think Mwilu is clean as a whistle and this will be the most embarrassing moment of Uhuru's second term.

[Kadudu]

Has she been found guilty? Being accused does not mean one is guilty. Be patient and let the trial go its full course then you can comment afterwards.

I know but she vindicates Jubilee - that was not a fair referee - but a player in the last election. I guess she figures out - she if finished either way.

[RV Pundit]

She is guilty of tax evasion and bribery.Her case is slam duck hehehe and her career at scork is over

[Kim Jong-Un's Pajama Pants]

Citation on Mwilu having an affair & kids with Amos Wako and close dealing with Prof OJienda - Key ODM planks   or you want me to quote Njoki meticulous demolition of so called discrepancy report prepared by Chief Registar.  Njoki went through original forms - and found out - where registry said it was not signed or bla bla bla - almost always it was not correct. It obvious somebody corrupted the verification process overseen by Chief Registar - romours was NASA did this - using watchmen at Annivissary Towers to replace genuine forms with fake forms.

Here is Njoki's dissenting opinion - Start from page 278

https://www.theelephant.info/uploads/2017/09/Dissenting-Opinion-Njoki-SCJ.pdf

I am having internet issues.  Put put some supporting citations and I'll be happy to look at them when internet cooperates.

Even if we suppose Njoki's is not the sad joke of a dissenting opinion that it actually is.  The ruling was not based on the stuff she "meticulously demolishes".