Gema will rule another 20 years of

[RV Pundit]

Prof Charles Hornsby is good.

I got closest in my article in June, which predicted a 55-45% victory, In fact, the closer to the election we got and the more information I acquired, the less accurate my predictions were. In fact, I had begun to doubt my own numbers and modified my eve-of-poll prediction from 53-47% (which the spreadsheet suggested) to 52% to 48%. I left however the predicted votes for each candidate the same, and there I was pretty close: the official constituency Form 34Bs show that Kenyatta beat Odinga by 8.2 million to 6.8 million votes, compared to which I had predicted 8 million to 7 million.

Read more at: https://www.theelephant.info/features/2017/09/07/forms-and-substance-comparing-predictions-and-results-from-kenyas-general-election/
The Elephant - Speaking truth to power.
https://www.theelephant.info/features/2017/09/07/forms-and-substance-comparing-predictions-and-results-from-kenyas-general-election/

[Omollo]

All this would be settled once and for all if the information collected by Morpho and handed over to the IEBC on the August elections were released. Why would Uhuru (and you) have to suffer the pain of your alleged 54% victory being questioned and delegitimized when you can put a full stop to it all by just releasing the data?

The reason is simple: It shows a first round win for Raila.

As for your paid poor white men peddling crap for peanuts, you know which part of your body to hide them.
 

Prof Charles Hornsby is good.

I got closest in my article in June, which predicted a 55-45% victory, In fact, the closer to the election we got and the more information I acquired, the less accurate my predictions were. In fact, I had begun to doubt my own numbers and modified my eve-of-poll prediction from 53-47% (which the spreadsheet suggested) to 52% to 48%. I left however the predicted votes for each candidate the same, and there I was pretty close: the official constituency Form 34Bs show that Kenyatta beat Odinga by 8.2 million to 6.8 million votes, compared to which I had predicted 8 million to 7 million.

Read more at: https://www.theelephant.info/features/2017/09/07/forms-and-substance-comparing-predictions-and-results-from-kenyas-general-election/
The Elephant - Speaking truth to power.
https://www.theelephant.info/features/2017/09/07/forms-and-substance-comparing-predictions-and-results-from-kenyas-general-election/

[Omollo]

I did not have to read far to find that the entire work you are proud of is nothing short of witchcraft.

It falls on the principle: Falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus. If the IEBC data is contaminated, the product is itself contaminated.

Then there is something you have not thought about.

1. Your first MOAS was withdrawn in a hurry after I went through and discovered glaring errors. It had the figure 52%. At that time Hornsby was peddling 53%. You went away and promptly returned with 53%.

2. Shortly after "Cheeseman" by his own "scientific" methods came out with about the same - 52 then 53. It smacked of collusion and collaboration;

3. You use a method unknown in physical and social science. Would you like to publish an article in a refereed journal so all of us can read and use the same to reach the same findings as you did? We sent a similar request to both Cheeseman and Hornsby and plan to have them impeached as scholars (if indeed they are scholars) or if they continue to peddle the same sorcery and call it science. A comprehensive review of their work in the Uhuru Electoral Fraud is being undertaken to make the case.

Obviously you are chokora in these matters and we can only throw pebbles at you like we do to stray mongrels. You require no special attention. Your accomplices however is a different matter.

The last I heard of it was trying to identify whether there is any existing persons by the name "Professor" Cheeseman and "Professor" Hornsby. That is because most European countries have a tradition of not using such titles - even PhDs - if one is not in employment (as a professor) or not engaged in scholarship. There are some exceptions - Britain for instance.

Prof Charles Hornsby is good.

I got closest in my article in June, which predicted a 55-45% victory, In fact, the closer to the election we got and the more information I acquired, the less accurate my predictions were. In fact, I had begun to doubt my own numbers and modified my eve-of-poll prediction from 53-47% (which the spreadsheet suggested) to 52% to 48%. I left however the predicted votes for each candidate the same, and there I was pretty close: the official constituency Form 34Bs show that Kenyatta beat Odinga by 8.2 million to 6.8 million votes, compared to which I had predicted 8 million to 7 million.

Read more at: https://www.theelephant.info/features/2017/09/07/forms-and-substance-comparing-predictions-and-results-from-kenyas-general-election/
The Elephant - Speaking truth to power.
https://www.theelephant.info/features/2017/09/07/forms-and-substance-comparing-predictions-and-results-from-kenyas-general-election/

[RV Pundit]

You're a sick puppy.

I did not have to read far to find that the entire work you are proud of is nothing short of witchcraft.

It falls on the principle: Falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus. If the IEBC data is contaminated, the product is itself contaminated.

Then there is something you have not thought about.

1. Your first MOAS was withdrawn in a hurry after I went through and discovered glaring errors. It had the figure 52%. At that time Hornsby was peddling 53%. You went away and promptly returned with 53%.

2. Shortly after "Cheeseman" by his own "scientific" methods came out with about the same - 52 then 53. It smacked of collusion and collaboration;

3. You use a method unknown in physical and social science. Would you like to publish an article in a refereed journal so all of us can read and use the same to reach the same findings as you did? We sent a similar request to both Cheeseman and Hornsby and plan to have them impeached as scholars (if indeed they are scholars) or if they continue to peddle the same sorcery and call it science. A comprehensive review of their work in the Uhuru Electoral Fraud is being undertaken to make the case.

Obviously you are chokora in these matters and we can only throw pebbles at you like we do to stray mongrels. You require no special attention. Your accomplices however is a different matter.

The last I heard of it was trying to identify whether there is any existing persons by the name "Professor" Cheeseman and "Professor" Hornsby. That is because most European countries have a tradition of not using such titles - even PhDs - if one is not in employment (as a professor) or not engaged in scholarship. There are some exceptions - Britain for instance.

Prof Charles Hornsby is good.

I got closest in my article in June, which predicted a 55-45% victory, In fact, the closer to the election we got and the more information I acquired, the less accurate my predictions were. In fact, I had begun to doubt my own numbers and modified my eve-of-poll prediction from 53-47% (which the spreadsheet suggested) to 52% to 48%. I left however the predicted votes for each candidate the same, and there I was pretty close: the official constituency Form 34Bs show that Kenyatta beat Odinga by 8.2 million to 6.8 million votes, compared to which I had predicted 8 million to 7 million.

Read more at: https://www.theelephant.info/features/2017/09/07/forms-and-substance-comparing-predictions-and-results-from-kenyas-general-election/
The Elephant - Speaking truth to power.
https://www.theelephant.info/features/2017/09/07/forms-and-substance-comparing-predictions-and-results-from-kenyas-general-election/

[Omollo]

You're a sick puppy.

Ad hominem