Author Topic: Maranga SCOK Kangaroo court established oct 25 2017  (Read 3057 times)

Offline patel

  • Moderator
  • Enigma
  • *
  • Posts: 3575
  • Reputation: 2110
Maranga SCOK Kangaroo court established oct 25 2017
« on: November 15, 2017, 08:16:20 PM »
even Njoki ndungu has found a voice to ask questions...



Offline patel

  • Moderator
  • Enigma
  • *
  • Posts: 3575
  • Reputation: 2110
Re: Maranga SCOK Kangaroo court established oct 25 2017
« Reply #1 on: November 15, 2017, 08:26:05 PM »
930809645773533184[/tweet]] [/url]

Offline Dear Mami

  • Enigma
  • *
  • Posts: 1493
  • Reputation: 643
Re: Maranga SCOK Kangaroo court established oct 25 2017
« Reply #2 on: November 16, 2017, 02:27:10 PM »
Why can't they avail a soft copy? Hawana pdf?

Offline RV Pundit

  • Moderator
  • Enigma
  • *
  • Posts: 38451
  • Reputation: 1074446
Re: Maranga SCOK Kangaroo court established oct 25 2017
« Reply #3 on: November 16, 2017, 02:35:29 PM »
Ndubi is certified moron - he was given soft copy - and then he demanded it to be printed - and that is cost.
Why can't they avail a soft copy? Hawana pdf?

Offline patel

  • Moderator
  • Enigma
  • *
  • Posts: 3575
  • Reputation: 2110
Re: Maranga SCOK Kangaroo court established oct 25 2017
« Reply #4 on: November 20, 2017, 09:49:00 PM »
Kangaroo court delivered uthamaki. Time for Kenya to reflect as we slowly enter unchartered territory. Good always win over evil.

Offline RV Pundit

  • Moderator
  • Enigma
  • *
  • Posts: 38451
  • Reputation: 1074446
Re: Maranga SCOK Kangaroo court established oct 25 2017
« Reply #5 on: November 20, 2017, 10:03:33 PM »
They are so sorry for wrongly annulling it the first time

Offline patel

  • Moderator
  • Enigma
  • *
  • Posts: 3575
  • Reputation: 2110
Re: Maranga SCOK Kangaroo court established oct 25 2017
« Reply #6 on: November 20, 2017, 10:30:38 PM »

Offline Kim Jong-Un's Pajama Pants

  • Moderator
  • Enigma
  • *
  • Posts: 8784
  • Reputation: 106254
  • An oryctolagus cuniculus is feeding on my couch
Re: Maranga SCOK Kangaroo court established oct 25 2017
« Reply #7 on: November 20, 2017, 10:48:35 PM »
Kangaroo court delivered uthamaki. Time for Kenya to reflect as we slowly enter unchartered territory. Good always win over evil.

What struck me was that they didn't care to explain why those petitions lack merit; I bet even the judges don't know and will have to make up some reasons possibly with some help from his mortal amicableness.  At least the last time, they actually shared outlines of their reasoning as they delivered the verdict.  Today?  Just the verdict without even a brief explanation.  One of the tale-tell signs of a mutungarooesque ruling.
"I freed a thousand slaves.  I could have freed a thousand more if only they knew they were slaves."

Harriet Tubman

Offline patel

  • Moderator
  • Enigma
  • *
  • Posts: 3575
  • Reputation: 2110
Re: Maranga SCOK Kangaroo court established oct 25 2017
« Reply #8 on: November 20, 2017, 11:30:46 PM »
precisely...signs of a court working under duress

Kangaroo court delivered uthamaki. Time for Kenya to reflect as we slowly enter unchartered territory. Good always win over evil.

What struck me was that they didn't care to explain why those petitions lack merit; I bet even the judges don't know and will have to make up some reasons possibly with some help from his mortal amicableness.  At least the last time, they actually shared outlines of their reasoning as they delivered the verdict.  Today?  Just the verdict without even a brief explanation.  One of the tale-tell signs of a mutungarooesque ruling.

Offline Nefertiti

  • Moderator
  • Enigma
  • *
  • Posts: 11347
  • Reputation: 26106
  • Shoo Be Doo Be Doo Oop
Re: Maranga SCOK Kangaroo court established oct 25 2017
« Reply #9 on: November 21, 2017, 01:53:52 AM »
The deficient merit was on the petitioners' shaky locus standi: they were neither candidates nor from the 29 constituencies. They must not hurt than the bereaved.
♫♫ They say all good boys go to heaven... but bad boys bring heaven to you ~ song by Julia Michaels

Offline vooke

  • Moderator
  • Enigma
  • *
  • Posts: 5985
  • Reputation: 8906
Re: Maranga SCOK Kangaroo court established oct 25 2017
« Reply #10 on: November 21, 2017, 06:43:00 AM »
Kangaroo court delivered uthamaki. Time for Kenya to reflect as we slowly enter unchartered territory. Good always win over evil.

What struck me was that they didn't care to explain why those petitions lack merit; I bet even the judges don't know and will have to make up some reasons possibly with some help from his mortal amicableness.  At least the last time, they actually shared outlines of their reasoning as they delivered the verdict.  Today?  Just the verdict without even a brief explanation.  One of the tale-tell signs of a mutungarooesque ruling.
What struck you is what struck IEBC and Jubilee in the first Petition. No amount of argument in the full judgement will convince you
2 Timothy 2:4  No man that warreth entangleth himself with the affairs of this life; that he may please him who hath chosen him to be a soldier.

Offline Kim Jong-Un's Pajama Pants

  • Moderator
  • Enigma
  • *
  • Posts: 8784
  • Reputation: 106254
  • An oryctolagus cuniculus is feeding on my couch
Re: Maranga SCOK Kangaroo court established oct 25 2017
« Reply #11 on: November 21, 2017, 07:18:01 AM »
Kangaroo court delivered uthamaki. Time for Kenya to reflect as we slowly enter unchartered territory. Good always win over evil.

What struck me was that they didn't care to explain why those petitions lack merit; I bet even the judges don't know and will have to make up some reasons possibly with some help from his mortal amicableness.  At least the last time, they actually shared outlines of their reasoning as they delivered the verdict.  Today?  Just the verdict without even a brief explanation.  One of the tale-tell signs of a mutungarooesque ruling.
What struck you is what struck IEBC and Jubilee in the first Petition. No amount of argument in the full judgement will convince you

There is no argument to make that an explanation is given in this iteration.  Or that none was given in the prior ruling.  So, not true.  Even though you said it.
"I freed a thousand slaves.  I could have freed a thousand more if only they knew they were slaves."

Harriet Tubman