I was trying in the shortest possible time to explain the Ongoro case to someone who had asked a simple question. I forgot you are around to knit pick so that I should have dotted the eyes and crossed the tees. I was just explaining in plain language what happened.
This plain language
Kajwang was handed the ticket when people thought Ongoro had agreed to run for a different seat or seek renomination.
is also quite clear and does not require the dotting or crossing of anything. One would have expected the people with the final responsibility for nominations certificates to actually
know and not just
think.
Like Robina says and I have said before, political parties are clubs which at the end of nominations, present the voter with a package to choose wholly, partially or reject totally. The countries that mandate primaries and legislate the method and even supervise are very few indeed. Most political parties select candidates using methods that are at best opaque and worst crude as they come.
I understand all that, and I have no problems with any of it. Nevertheless, if a party claims that candidates will be selected through a fair and transparent process, then that is what it should give its members; this is especially important in ODM's case, given its hopelessly rigged primaries in 2013. Beyond that, while I am not an ODM member, I am interested in such matters because they give me an idea of how Rails works (and would work as president). I imagine that to be the case with others too. Oh, he also rigged-in his man in my home-home area back in 2013; we weren't amused.
1. Ongoro had NOT presented her name for Ruaraka Constituency by the end of the deadline.
2. Kajwang was handed the certificate being unopposed
3. Ongoro protests that she wanted to run for Ruaraka
4. She is allowed to file papers for Ruaraka out of time (but on account of IEBC having extended its deadline for receiving aspirants)
5. Her name entered in the list of aspirants and handed to the IEBC
6. Ongoro informed that she would fight it out with Kajwang for the Ruaraka ticket
7. Lady Ongoro refuses to fight in primaries (with Kajwang or anybody) and demands a direct ticket
8. Party rejects her demands
9. Ongoro leads demo and attacks Orange House injuring party secretariat staff
10. Disciplinary action taken fining her and barring her from primaries in Ruraka because it was determined that her choice of Ruraka was to blackmail the party leadership for other benefits
11. She "defects" to ANC though her name is NOT on the ANC list of aspirants handed to the IEBC and duly gazetted.
The revised story is definitely much better than the original. Of course, at the moment, we have no independent and helpful other source (e.g. an ODM official) that has even suggested anything that would come close to confirming the revision. The events in your list certainly occurred; your novel contribution seems to be in the ordering. (And that, by the way, is not nit-picking; it is very significant.) I know that all news outlets in Kenya are controlled by Jubilee-NIS----according to you anyway---but I have to work with whatever is at hand. Having gone through a number of newspaper articles, video reports, etc., let me point out just a couple of things:
(a) At the point at which you place (2), relative to (9) we have, for example, this report on the day of the incident:
Though the party explained that there had been no direct nomination in Ruaraka, Ms. Ongoro still insisted that she had been sidelined.
https://www.kenyans.co.ke/news/odm-executive-director-oduor-ongwen-assaulted-rowdy-supporters-18047(According to the article, the protest was about an alleged plot to bar Ongoro from vying in Ruaraka. Guess what the final outcome was?)
(b) Take a look at the order of your (4) and (9). Some articles suggest that the inclusion of her name was the fruit of the mayhem she instigated:
She later emerged from a meeting with the ODM Secretariat which confirmed that her name and that of incumbent Ruaraka MP were on the party lists forwarded to the IEBC ahead of the nominations slated to begin next week.
http://allafrica.com/stories/201704060023.htmlAnd so on, and so forth.
I'm not saying it is untrue---I don't know one way or anther as yet---but this story that she was fighting for a direct nomination seems quite new and unknown to most.
Given ODM's history in such matters, I'm more inclined to believe what Robina has written above. What you then add to your list doesn't really help much. If anything, it merely confirms that Ongoro was fighting a battle that had already been lost, right from the git-go. This:
The party leadership felt that Kajwang stood a better chance than Ongoro.
As noted above, it is the party's to front candidates of its choosing. But, as also noted above, certain types of actions have implications.
Yet more confirmation of Ongoro's "position" came via ODM's "disciplinary committee". Both her and Obado were fined for causing mayhem, but only Ongoro was told to go vie elsewhere. That even though the violence in the Obado event was such that it sent you rushing here to "reveal" an attempt to "assassinate" Joho!
That is if at all she was ever serious about running rather than proving she wanted to run.
What do her actions since then tell you?