My point is that when it comes to corruption we cannot rely on "good people'. The culture of corruption has permeated Kenya to the point that there is no tribe, political party, or gender that can be trusted NOT to be corrupt solely based on their own moral compass. It is true that there are such people but they are too few and without strong institutions, these people are easily overwhelmed by bad people.
Note that I neither stated nor implied a sole reliance on moral goodness. That said, "good people" are needed, and they need to be put into place, e.g. by being voted into power, being appointed, etc. Strong institutions do not develop on their own; they first need the right sort of leadership. In fact, I would say that it is impossible to accomplish positive change, or anything positive at all, without "good people". (See my NOTE below.)
You correctly note that
All the good things that we now enjoy in Kenya came from the liberation struggle and the progressive left, whether it is the presidential term limits, free press, end of political detentions, multiparty, or devolution all now enshrined in the new Katiba.
Some of the people who led that struggle might have been in it just for the power, but I believe there was also much more: a very strong sense of right vs. wrong and what would benefit the country---"goodness", if you will. In fact, I would say that many those "good things" came about because some "good people" had the courage and strength to act on their core beliefs. Moreover, the nation had thoroughly been kicked in the teeth by a "bad guy" and was ready to accommodate anyone even slightly different.
If, say, Raila is to be elected president, people will have to be convinced that he is a "good guy"---that he will not help himself and his friend to the national treasury, abuse institutions, stomp on people's rights, etc. I certainly can't see him getting very far on the basis that "
I might not be a good guy, but when it comes to corruption we cannot rely on good people'".
NOTE: As a matter of interpretation, I should point out that I believe in "practical ethics"---"goodness" and "badness" to be judged by actions,
not words or the "unknowables" in people's hearts and minds and whatever.
The reason why I favor CORD is not because they are less corrupt but because we need change and they are more likely to change the system than the people entrenched in power.
To my mind, the top two things that prevent Kenya from being what it could be are corruption and tribalism. Of these, both the public and the opposition seem to get more worked up about corruption. If CORD cannot be "favoured" on that score---and, indeed, you note that "
CORD will be just as corrupt as any other political party"---then: (a) which parts of the system does it propose to change, and (b) why are those parts more critical than the No. 1 Evil?
More generally, just what is it that CORD would change if it got into power? Why, how, and when?
If we continue this route, sooner or than later this country will burn.
That's coming, but it will take a while. As the Moi years showed, Kenyans have a great capacity to sock up punishment.