I don't remember him saying he is investigating the Reserve Bank. I think he needs information from the Reserve Bank about the Eurobond from the reserve bank. He is investigating the Treasury. I could be wrong - in which case I'll take another look at his report.
Yes, all he has stated is that he needs to get direct information from the banks involved; and that is hardly surprising given the funny photostat copies that Treasury has put out. But Uhuru's claim perfectly suits his lot.
Yes, the Treasury seems to be where the problem lies. Treasury has been involved in two sorts of lies and fudging:
One is a bit subtle and similar to the low-level street scam of a punting trying to guess which of three cups covers the peanut: where the Eurobond money actually is depends on who is asking and when they are asking.
The other one is more straightforward, and I will give a concrete example. Go here
http://www.treasury.go.ke/eurobond.html and look at the .pdf file under "
Sovereign Bond (Eurobond): Questions And Answers."
Now look at Qu. 10.According to Treasury, the Auditor General "confirmed" that the funds had been deposited in the Consolidated Fund. And to "prove" that, the note then includes a statement from the Auditor General. The only problem is that the Auditor General statement says nothing of the sort! All it says is that what is supposedly in some overseas account + what is in some CBK account add up to whatever the amount is supposed to be.
It's all right there for everyone to read, but on that smoke-and-mirrors basis it was then claimed that "the Auditor General has cleared the Eurobond".
Anyone who takes the time to carefully look at all the stuff Treasury has put out will end up either laughing or being totally shocked. I would urge people to go beyond the popular media and to take a closer look. The lack of consistency, internal to among the various documents, is astonishing.
Further in that document---
http://www.treasury.go.ke/eurobond.html under "Sovereign Bond (Eurobond): Questions And Answers."---there are what Treasury claims are allocations from those monies. The main question in the latest Auditor General's report is this: If the money was put into the CF as claimed and then allocated as claimed, then where is the evidence? Answering that requires answers to at least three questions:
(i) did all the money end up in the CF?,
(ii) was it allocated as claimed?, and
(iii) if so, where is the evidence, by way of expenditure?
The Auditor General apparently hasn't had any joy anywhere, if his latest report is anything go by.
And there has also been "the IMF has cleared the Eurobond" type of type of thing, whatever that means. The fact is that if one looks at both public IMF statements and "detailed" accounts, they say little no more than that Kenya received the money. Come to think of it, it's shaky even on that front: IMF's documents show the money being accounted for in one financial year, as they were told by GoK. But in the face of stiff questioning, Treasury, in its jump-and-dodge game then later moved things to the next financial year!