Now you're deliberately mixing stuff. Kenya can never be US or China with its 45M people. So let not debate about being no 1 or 2 or 3 in the world.
Your argument is that Kenya should follow the "USA model" because Kenya is somehow like the USA in the late 19th Century to early 20 Century. What I have done is point out to you a few significant differences.
If you wish to sustain your argument, then the definition of "industrialized" and population sizes are not helpful. Instead of such, you should do at least two things: (1) state how Kenya is like the USA of the period; (2) give some indicators of how, on that basis, Kenya will then be able to follow a similar path as the USA. Feel free to proceed whenever you are ready. But "proof by assertion" simply won't do.
We are talking about becoming INDUSTRALIZED. That is achieved I think when industry (manufacturing) account for 30-50% of GDP. Swiszterland is industrialized but isn't anywhere near no 10 or 20.
My point was to indicate the
growth in US manufacturing of the period. See the "follow-up" question on the growth of Kenyan manufacturing.
You have also deliberately ignored my India analogy - which is more advanced kenya - whose economy mirrors kenya - ignoring the scale!
I did not ignore it. You wrote that:
I meant the USA of 1900 had nearly the same conditions that we have here and that exist in India for example.
I noted that:
* Kenya imports a lot of pharmaceuticals, machinery, steel products, power transmission equipment, yarn, and automobiles from India.
* The latter imports tea, vegetables, leather, soda ash and scrap metal from Kenya.
Just to be sure, I asked you to tell us what those "same conditions" are. I did not see an answer.
You subsequently wrote that:
In summary for kenya-we have to follow the US model--and first get to where India is ...
So, now, India and Kenya are not comparable, and what Kenya should do is get to "where India is". I have already stated my views on the the "USA model". As to working to get "where India is", I'm all for it. What is it that you wanted me to comment on in regard to India?