Author Topic: The Information Communication Technology Practioneers Bill 2016  (Read 3258 times)

Offline Empedocles

  • VIP
  • Enigma
  • *
  • Posts: 823
  • Reputation: 15758
This is absolutely ridiculous:

[pdf]http://kenyalaw.org/kl/fileadmin/pdfdownloads/bills/2016/InformationCommunicationTechnologyPractitioners_Bill_2016.pdf[/pdf]

Offline MOON Ki

  • Moderator
  • Enigma
  • *
  • Posts: 2667
  • Reputation: 5780
Re: The Information Communication Technology Practioneers Bill 2016
« Reply #1 on: July 07, 2016, 05:54:29 PM »
Truly bizarre.    It looks like Bill Gates, Mark Zuckerberg, Michael Dell, etc. would be unfit to work in ICT in Kenya, even if they could pass the "Council"'s examinations.   

What is this supposed to achieve?
MOON Ki  is  Muli Otieno Otiende Njoroge arap Kiprotich
Your True Friend, Brother,  and  Compatriot.

Offline Kim Jong-Un's Pajama Pants

  • Moderator
  • Enigma
  • *
  • Posts: 8783
  • Reputation: 106254
  • An oryctolagus cuniculus is feeding on my couch
Re: The Information Communication Technology Practioneers Bill 2016
« Reply #2 on: July 07, 2016, 06:38:11 PM »
I haven't gone through it.  But when I see licensing and that kind of thing, I am confused what role politicians should have in determining any of these things.  What are they trying to achieve?  I suspect it's just government trying to extend its reach where it's absence is actually desirable.
"I freed a thousand slaves.  I could have freed a thousand more if only they knew they were slaves."

Harriet Tubman

Offline MOON Ki

  • Moderator
  • Enigma
  • *
  • Posts: 2667
  • Reputation: 5780
Re: The Information Communication Technology Practioneers Bill 2016
« Reply #3 on: July 07, 2016, 08:05:08 PM »
I haven't gone through it.  But when I see licensing and that kind of thing, I am confused what role politicians should have in determining any of these things.  What are they trying to achieve?  I suspect it's just government trying to extend its reach where it's absence is actually desirable.

Licensing is just be beginning.   The "Council" will deal with everything, ranging from practitioners who are "insensitive to clients' feelings" or who show incompetence as a result of a "character defect" or "emotional disturbance" .... to deciding the subject matter of courses, the manner in which the courses are offered, standards of internship, etc.   
MOON Ki  is  Muli Otieno Otiende Njoroge arap Kiprotich
Your True Friend, Brother,  and  Compatriot.

Offline Kim Jong-Un's Pajama Pants

  • Moderator
  • Enigma
  • *
  • Posts: 8783
  • Reputation: 106254
  • An oryctolagus cuniculus is feeding on my couch
Re: The Information Communication Technology Practioneers Bill 2016
« Reply #4 on: July 08, 2016, 01:53:33 AM »
I haven't gone through it.  But when I see licensing and that kind of thing, I am confused what role politicians should have in determining any of these things.  What are they trying to achieve?  I suspect it's just government trying to extend its reach where it's absence is actually desirable.

Licensing is just be beginning.   The "Council" will deal with everything, ranging from practitioners who are "insensitive to clients' feelings" or who show incompetence as a result of a "character defect" or "emotional disturbance" .... to deciding the subject matter of courses, the manner in which the courses are offered, standards of internship, etc.   

That is insane.  Are these idiots saying they are going to determine you can legitimately do IT work only if they license you?  Baloney.  It will be the only place on the planet with such restrictions.
"I freed a thousand slaves.  I could have freed a thousand more if only they knew they were slaves."

Harriet Tubman

Offline MOON Ki

  • Moderator
  • Enigma
  • *
  • Posts: 2667
  • Reputation: 5780
Re: The Information Communication Technology Practioneers Bill 2016
« Reply #5 on: July 08, 2016, 02:15:56 AM »
Are these idiots saying they are going to determine you can legitimately do IT work only if they license you? 

Pretty much.   And they are serious about it: fine of up to 0.5 million shillings and/or 2 years in jail for practicing IT without a license.     
MOON Ki  is  Muli Otieno Otiende Njoroge arap Kiprotich
Your True Friend, Brother,  and  Compatriot.

Offline Kim Jong-Un's Pajama Pants

  • Moderator
  • Enigma
  • *
  • Posts: 8783
  • Reputation: 106254
  • An oryctolagus cuniculus is feeding on my couch
Re: The Information Communication Technology Practioneers Bill 2016
« Reply #6 on: July 08, 2016, 03:32:12 AM »
Are these idiots saying they are going to determine you can legitimately do IT work only if they license you? 

Pretty much.   And they are serious about it: fine of up to 0.5 million shillings and/or 2 years in jail for practicing IT without a license.     

This must have been written by someone like Duale in his spare time.
"I freed a thousand slaves.  I could have freed a thousand more if only they knew they were slaves."

Harriet Tubman

Offline RV Pundit

  • Moderator
  • Enigma
  • *
  • Posts: 38335
  • Reputation: 1074446
Re: The Information Communication Technology Practioneers Bill 2016
« Reply #7 on: July 08, 2016, 07:04:24 AM »
This is private bill -not a gov bill - and is headed direct to the dustbin.

Offline Georgesoros

  • Moderator
  • Enigma
  • *
  • Posts: 4659
  • Reputation: 7043
Re: The Information Communication Technology Practioneers Bill 2016
« Reply #8 on: July 08, 2016, 03:36:59 PM »
You need a certification to practice ICT?
WHat is being done today will be old age tomorrow, especially ICT.
 What a waste of resources to draft such crap.

Offline Empedocles

  • VIP
  • Enigma
  • *
  • Posts: 823
  • Reputation: 15758
Re: The Information Communication Technology Practioneers Bill 2016
« Reply #9 on: July 08, 2016, 04:43:20 PM »
This is private bill -not a gov bill - and is headed direct to the dustbin.

You're right.