The Israelis seem upset that he referred to their country as "Palestine". I think M7 is right on that one: I believe "Palestine", properly, includes Israel; so he made the man PM of an even larger territory ... a sort of praise? He also described Herod as "a bad gentleman"; I see no reason to argue with that one. Even some of his "linguistic" slips are on the mark---for example, when he starts talking about "bonding" with Israel and then refers to "bondage", which must be how certain people to the East see the evolution of their relationship with Israel. And a legitimate question on the date of Jesus's birth: "by definition", how could it be 4AD?
(I didn't watch all of it, but I imagine it must be entertaining.)