I think we can be fairly certain that today Josephine Kabura Irungu is not eating grass. I am hearing a story along the lines that the computer system was hacked. What is the evidence for that?
The hacking story balloon was flying high until the usual ineptness puncture it. They found the culprit and then absolved him immediately:
Investigations into the attempted fraud at the National Youth Service (NYS) moved up a gear with cyber-crime detectives said to have zeroed in on the IP (Internet Protocol) address of the computer used in the transaction. The Banking Fraud Investigations Unit (BFIU) traced the processing of tenders for road construction and supply of building materials worth Sh122.2 million to the principal secretary in the Devolution ministry, and cleared it as sound. Detectives are now focusing on Sh695.4 million in the second transaction.
Read more at: http://www.standardmedia.co.ke/article/2000166805/cid-chase-fresh-lead-in-nys-fraud-investigation/
In other words, the PS sat quietly and watched as his "desperately" minister called the CID to determine who had made the suspicious transaction while knowing all the while that he had done it. The matter went to the media and created a ping pong of letters between CBK, Treasury, Devolution (his own Ministry) NYS and CID and he said nothing.
However when the CID found out that the IP belonged to his computer, he said the transaction was "clean" and they moved on... They did not take down his statement or ask to get an explanation why he kept quiet. They did not ask whether Waiguru knew about this (or did not know). In my book
knowing and
not knowing committed by a senior officer earn the same grade!
Now the clincher:
The Officer in Charge of the BFIU Joseph Mugwanga in a response letter to Waiguru on the progress of the probe, says only the forensic examination being conducted on the six computers seized from NYS employees, could unearth the person who made the fraudulent entries.
Which part of the Law allows the police to update Waiguru on the progress of the investigations in which she may well be the perpetrator? What happened to the independence that the people of Kenya gave the Police? Who made them answerable to Waiguru?
So you can see why she decided to use the CID to whitewash her thievery.
Note also that in decent countries, the directors of the companies would have been the first to be questioned. They are after all the beneficiaries. Why is the CID concentrating on NYS when the beneficiaries are walking free.
Then there is the small detail of whether these services were openly procured.