Narrow margin is understandable - even US of A has struggled with that. But Ruto/Kalenjin have conceded twice when beaten blue - in 2002 and 2010. Raila has been beaten blue in 1997 - distant third - only 10 percent - exclusively from Luo Nyanza - never conceded. The same beating his father got in 1992 - never conceded. The same beating Jubilee gave him - a million - then a million and half votes. I can understand 2007 because the margin was mere 200k.
2017 - beaten blue by whopping nearly 2 million votes - given second chance by Maraga (over processes) - and shamelessly boycotted election because he had no win to start from.
In short Raila has never read any concession speech since he entered politics.
Democracy requires participants to accept defeat - we cannot create enough positions to have everyone as the winner - someone has to LOSE.
BBSQIUE thinking is that we dont need election - because they are competitive - it's bullshiet. It's like doing coalition after election where winner and loser merge - what is the point of election then? or democracy?
Pundit, I asked you the day before yesterday if there would be war if Raila won fair and square by a narrow margin and you said yes. You guys believe if he wins that's automatic rigging and SCOK can't resolve it. Tell me how yours is different from 'BBIesque' thinking.