I am happy to continue the debate anytime.
We were talking population dynamics.
I told the main grouse in Mt kenya about const - is actually Nairobi Metro - places like Kiambu - the areas growing - are not Kikuyu rural places like Njamba Githunguri - they are Nairobi bedroom towns of Ruiru, Ruaka, Thika, Kikuyu. These are cosmopolitan nature.
Now when I was doing MOAS - I knew from KNBS that Kiambu was 81 percent kikuyus, 6 percent Kamba and the rest others.
Obviously Uhuru scores like 80 percent - all kikuyus - then share the 20 percent - and that time I thought it would be 50:50 share.
So I did 81 plus 10 - and came to 91 percent.
Elsewhere in areas like Nyeri where Kikuyus 98 percent - Uhuru would score 97 percent.
Now let go back to const debate; We already knew Mt kenya has the most protected now -8 of them including Lamu West.
We see in BBI when they use a 170k pop quota that main increase would be in Nairobi, Nakuru and Kiambu.
And Nairobi we know the tribal breakdown.
Kiambu - the 5 of new ones - will definitely come from Nairobi Metro - Ruiru, Juja, Thika and Kikuyu - and I told even one of those could go non-local - like Kahawa west or something ward is already gone to Luo.
Nakuru - 5 - you know Kikuyu are about half - so we are talking about 3 out 2 - with 3 going to kikuyus; 2 to kalenjin.
CONCLUSION: BASELESS PROPAGANDA SPREAD BY LOW IQed Mt kenya Political class.
He did a MOAS in 2017 indicating Uhuru will get 91 % of votes in Mt Kenya amd when I told him he actually ended up getting 93% He tried to refute that because earlier he commented that MT Kenyans are just 70% of the population in Kiambu. These type of inconsistency should be well documented. No need yo delete threads.
Your buddy RV Pundit needs to stop deleting our posts. We had a discussion on why his inciteful threads should be banned. Before he deleted it.