You're an idiot who doesn't understand anything.
1) He already lost governorship - despite being elected by 1 million people.
2) He risk loosing the chance to ever hold office.
That is great prejudice than anybody out there.
If Sonko present evidence of fraud - including audios he is now unleashing - the court should revert him as governor - pending the hearing of the case.
There is evidence enough of Uhuru machination - starting with Badi - a military man as governor - and rigging of zoom vote (legally unchartered waters)
If I was a judge - I will revert Sonko back - like Embu Wambora - and hear the case
Esp because Speaker can only act for two months - and then we have lacuna!
The speaker cannot continue to act - beyond two months - he has National Assembly duties - it would be crazy if speaker can continue beyond 2 months.
Nobody in Nairobi will suffer serious prejudice if Sonko comes back for few months pending determination of the case. Bar a few MCAs.
Nairobeans elected him on free will. Nairobean cannot suffer any serious prejudice if the governor they elected stay for a few months pending the determination of the case.
There is already an acting governor not a permanent DG. Sonko "prejudice" is limited to 60 days so I see no compelling reason for a judge to remedy it immediately. If he loses the case he is toast and can't vie probably anywhere for anything. If he wins he gets back the job. Where is the prejudice again?
Wambora and Waititu cases are quite different from Sonko's.