The truth is, Supreme Courts can pretty much make the law of their countries say whatever they want. I'm sure they could find something in the Constitution that they could use to justify this if they wanted to do that. HOWEVER, while I didn't follow the petition, everything I've seen from these judges indicates that they take the timelines of the Constitution as seriously as any other section of the constitution, so I DO NOT see that happening myself. However, I remember there was a controversy about the timing of the first elections held under this Constitution. It was pushed by a few months because the IEBC just wasn't ready and kina Martha Karua vigorously protested the unconstitutionality of that move but it eventually got the Judiciary's stamp of approval. I don't remember if it was litigated all the way up to the Supreme Court though. I remember thinking they(SCORK) chickened out of a case but I am not sure if it was that case or another where they basically refused to take it up and allowed the decision of the lower court to stand.