I am not an expert on this revenue sharing thing but you would think they would come up with a formulae that does not shortchange anyone. Money should follow people and functions. Higher population means you need more schools, hospitals, roads sewage etc in places like Turkana, maybe we should only think of the habituated areas for revenue and not the whole expanse of the wasteland, they will still get a lot of money because their lifestyle means they occupy an area probably the size of Kiambu. If one guy decides to go live on top of Mt Kenya, we cannot start worrying about how services are going to get there, it’s ridiculous. They can come up with a binary system but Turkana with like 300k people getting more money than let’s say Muranga or Nandi is stupid and mind boggling. This should not even be a tribal issue, actually the central government continues to fund big projects like roads in Turkana and even with all the money, you would think with a small population, they can create a welfare system where they wire a little money to everyone so the famine does not devastate them every year.