A link to this might convince Pundit, seeing the empirical evidence of the SGR's actual performance won't move him. I'm not holding my breath.
All in the
nipate.org archives. RV Pundit should easily remember them, because he was the one peddling GoK's financial figures, and I was the one pointing out---with links and what-not----that the base figures were only a "reasonable" guess from the Canadian Consultants. In any case, one of the things I "admire"about RV Pundit is that he won't allow facts and empirical evidence to get in the way. That's exactly what is needed for
the first rank of cannon fodder ... the clueless "avant garde" ... interesting debate.
Another "famous" bogus "figure": For quite a while there was this claim that the SGR would account for 1.5% annual GDP growth (i.e. almost one-fourth of the annual 6-7%) in perpetuity. That was another case of an enthusiastic GoK type "misunderstanding" (actually just promoting a questionable/eating venture) and running away with statements from IMF/World-Bank types, which simply had something to do with the loan amounts relative to GDP. Then, after some feedback, it got dropped from "in perpetuity" to "during construction". Then it just got totally dropped after the first year of construction.
Here's why GoK dropped such statements after the first year of SGR construction: Look at the annual figures from KNBS. They won't tell you where SGR comes in precisely, but they will tell you it's under "building and construction", which includes a whole bunch of stuff. For simplicity, just assume that the SGR during construction was 100% of "building and construction" in Kenya. You will still have serious problems getting to the 1.5%. Gok types quickly dropped that figure, but they were thrown around on
nipate,org for quite some time.
So, what exactly---as in concrete figures---does the SGR contribute to the economy. Nobody has a clue. And, this time, nobody is willing to look silly. Best guess ... it will pay off in 100-200 years.
P.S: While writing the above, I thought I' take a look at latest reports on onwards-and-upwards, as given by the KNBS. You will find some under the "leading economic indicator reports", here:
https://www.knbs.or.ke/data-releases/In the March 2019 (monthly report), for our latest progress on "
Manufacturing, Building, and Construction", we have these highlights (page v):
The quantity of cement produced increased from 470,146 MT in February 2019 to 507,037 MT in March 2019. Consumption of cement rose from 469,809 MT in February 2019 to 505,465 MT in March 2019. Sugar production decreased from 53,060 Metric tonnes in January 2019 to 46,139 Metric tonnes in February 2019. Production of assembled vehicles decreased from 476 units in November 2018 to 327 units in December 2019. Milk uptake in the formal sector dropped from 46.55 million litres in February 2019 to 44.03 million litres in March 2019.
A bunch of cement, some assembled vehicles, sugar, and milk. Sugar and milk. That's our sort of big-stuff in manufacturing? And didn't Moi already give us all the milk---free--that we need? Still, if people aren't buying more locally produced vehicles, they are at least drinking more milk. Milk is health is prosperity. And love, peace , and unity.
And, no, looking at other, earlier, KNBS reports won't yield much happier fare to support anything to do with the SGR ... You will look at the stuff for which "increases"/"decreases" are considered worth reporting, and you will think "
Seriously? What the blank! And the story about industrializing or whatever by 2030... The Vision?"