Njoki Ndungu LIED on the Bench

[RV Pundit]

You really have the patience to deal with the moron.

Section 12 (2) of the Supreme Court Act, 2011
http://kenyalaw.org/kl/fileadmin/pdfdownloads/Acts/SupremeCourtAct_No.7of2011_2.pdf

[RV Pundit]

I am absolutely okay with any truth seeking. That will never change as long as I am alive. I don't think you understand how brutally honest I am and was brought up to be. I will not defend any rigging. And I don't want any rigging.I also know a loser when I see one..the truth before me is that Raila has no path to victory. I don't want him rigged out - I want us to have the most free, fair, credible and name it election or court processes.

How about a full fledged Commission of Inquiry led by an International Judge to:
1. Look into the 2013 and 2017 elections

Oops .. Today is the 4th Anniversary of Westgate! Yet no commision of inquiry promised by Uhuru Kenyatta. Please remind him when you are smoking weed together this evening, would you?

[Omollo]

It is not my homework. You made a claim and it is within my rights to demand evidence and your obligation to provide the same unchallenged.

If you are unable, say so and withdraw the claims you made. This is a matter of honor and respect. Of course I know such things as honor and respect are not treasured by all.

IEBC once a petition has been filled - is required by law - to furnish the petitioner, the respondents and SCOK court - with form 34s. I don't know how hard that is to understand.

Please do this. Otherwise I am not in business of helping you do your homework. Read election laws.

Again my offer to translate to Kipsigis stands.

[RV Pundit]

I gave you enough hints and pictures to help you. You claims to have read many things..but obviously you're not done reading her vagina..before you start with her tribe (you obviously have issues with women and kikuyus)..so once you're ready to read the election laws ( election acts, iebc regulations, constitutions and supreme court act, iebc act ) then come here and act like you know shiet.

It is not my homework. You made a claim and it is within my rights to demand evidence and your obligation to provide the same unchallenged.
If you are unable, say so and withdraw the claims you made. This is a matter of honor and respect. Of course I know such things as honor and respect are not treasured by all.

[Omollo]

Let those who do not know you and how you have worked against any move to promote transparency and end rigging as a political believe you. You have glorified and cheered all the corrupted methods of acquiring power while denigrating and humiliating those who oppose such means and methods.
 

I am absolutely okay with any truth seeking. That will never change as long as I am alive. I don't think you understand how brutally honest I am and was brought up to be. I will not defend any rigging. And I don't want any rigging.I also know a loser when I see one..the truth before me is that Raila has no path to victory. I don't want him rigged out - I want us to have the most free, fair, credible and name it election or court processes.

How about a full fledged Commission of Inquiry led by an International Judge to:
1. Look into the 2013 and 2017 elections

Oops .. Today is the 4th Anniversary of Westgate! Yet no commision of inquiry promised by Uhuru Kenyatta. Please remind him when you are smoking weed together this evening, would you?

[Omollo]

You have not figured it out?

There is no such thing. It does not exist. It is up to the petitioner to determine what he needs. Forms cannot be brought where they are an issue.

I posted those rules here at the beginning of the petition. I compared with the 2013 rules and noted the changes made. Then you dare arrogate yourself the position of trying to do what? Baradhuli!

This is closest you get until Mucheru reopens judiciary website

[pdf]http://kenyalaw.org/kl/fileadmin/pdfdownloads/LegalNotices/2017/113-SupremeCourt_PresidentialElectionPetition_Rules_2017.pdf[/pdf]

I gave you enough hints and pictures to help you. You claims to have read many things..but obviously you're not done reading her vagina..before you start with her tribe (you obviously have issues with women and kikuyus)..so once you're ready to read the election laws ( election acts, iebc regulations, constitutions and supreme court act, iebc act ) then come here and act like you know shiet.

[RV Pundit]

I analyze things as they are and as dispassionately as  possible. It doesn't matter the subject. I have supported all genuine efforts to improve our voting. I oppose brinkmanshipand impractical demands by NASA.Make a sensible suggestion forward on anything - you have me. But any nonsense you bring here or that Raila bring forth - will not find a fan here.

Let those who do not know you and how you have worked against any move to promote transparency and end rigging as a political believe you. You have glorified and cheered all the corrupted methods of acquiring power while denigrating and humiliating those who oppose such means and methods.

[vooke]

Omorlo,
I shared a wrong link


http://kenyalaw.org/lex/rest//db/kenyalex/Kenya/Legislation/English/Acts%20and%20Regulations/S/Supreme%20Court%20Act%20Cap.%209A%20-%20Act%20No.%207%20of%202011/docs/SupremeCourtAct7of2011.pdf

Looks like IEBC only surrenders the certified copies of forms 34A,34B,and 34C once a Petition is filed

[RV Pundit]

You're insufferable.

You have not figured it out?
There is no such thing. It does not exist. It is up to the petitioner to determine what he needs. Forms cannot be brought where they are an issue.

[RV Pundit]

Thanks again for helping our resident moron. This was part of the amendments introduced last year.

Petition is filed. 48hrs to serve it. 48hrs for IEBC to hand over form 34s to SCOK. 4 days from the date the petition is filled SCOK Judges had the evidence...that Njoki allegedly introduced some morons.
'

Omorlo,
I shared a wrong link


http://kenyalaw.org/lex/rest//db/kenyalex/Kenya/Legislation/English/Acts%20and%20Regulations/S/Supreme%20Court%20Act%20Cap.%209A%20-%20Act%20No.%207%20of%202011/docs/SupremeCourtAct7of2011.pdf

Looks like IEBC only surrenders the certified copies of forms 34A,34B,and 34C once a Petition is filed

[Kadame10]

Deal with what? I am dealing with your ignorance. Invest in law 101. This is ICC redux but this time round you don't have MoonKi to help you out. This things you can actually read and learn. I didn't go to any law schools but I can ran circles around a bimbo like Kadame.

It's SCOK.  Deal with it.

Ati run circles around whom? where? when? Link, tafadhali!  I see you are still reeling over my laughing at you for your newfound faith in R,Os who are able to correctly guess the content of 34B and the personal scrutiny of hundreds of forms by a busy judge hearing a busy case in an incredibly short period. Pole baba. I had no idea it would sting so much.

[kwesta]

I like this

[RV Pundit]

You're an embarrassment to legal fraternity and scholarship. I hope you did quit and went for sisterhood instead.

Ati run circles around whom? where? when? Link, tafadhali!  I see you are still reeling over my laughing at you for your newfound faith in R,Os who are able to correctly guess the content of 34B and the personal scrutiny of hundreds of forms by a busy judge hearing a busy case in an incredibly short period. Pole baba. I had no idea it would sting so much.

[Kadame10]

You're an embarrassment to legal fraternity and scholarship. I hope you did quit and went for sisterhood instead.

Ati run circles around whom? where? when? Link, tafadhali!  I see you are still reeling over my laughing at you for your newfound faith in R,Os who are able to correctly guess the content of 34B and the personal scrutiny of hundreds of forms by a busy judge hearing a busy case in an incredibly short period. Pole baba. I had no idea it would sting so much.

Was that the link where you ran circles with your mbing brain? 

[RV Pundit]

Start from this thread. If you don't even realize it then you're worse off than you think. Ask Robina or Vooke to help you. They seem to have the patiences to gladly suffer fools. I don't. It my main weakness. You claim Njoki introduced new evidence...which is false..because all she did was to verify allegations made by Raila against copies of form 34s that were furnished to her immediately Raila filled her petition. And she found the copies were okay -signed, stamped and seriliazed - while SCOK registar found the originals to be unsigned, unstamped and unseriliazed...and hence the big dilemma we find ourselves as observers in Nipate.

Was that the link where you ran circles with your mbing brain? 

[Kadame10]

Start from this thread. If you don't even realize it then you're worse off than you think. Ask Robina or Vooke to help you. They seem to have the patients to suffer fools. I don't. It my main weakness.

Was that the link where you ran circles with your mbing brain? 

Lets. Which part was the circle at? Where you claimed Njoki used her own staff because you saw a video of a judge somewhere with two staffers? Did it herself? Then gave an asinine analogy about DNA evidence that doesn't remotely deal with this? Or was it the bit where you demonstrated you have no idea what evidence is, who can make a determination on it? Was that the part where you were drawing circles with your mbing brain, Pundit? Maybe it was when you opened your exclusive dictionary of insults from choo to hurl at everyone who disagrees with you? That part I saw.

[RV Pundit]

I even doubt you know nothing- I somewhat remember you claiming to have read law but maybe a BA or those dodgy law degrees from KEMU.

You see before we proceed... I want you to tell us honestly if you have read
1) Constitution - sections that deal with presidency and elections.
2) Election Act of 2011/2016 - and all the ammendments thereof
3) IEBC act
4) IEBC regulations
5) Supreme court Act & regulation regarding petitions.
6) You have at least basic understanding of the court proceedings - which is all you know?

Once we are clear on those - we can proceed. All these are pertinent here.

Like I said some of us are committed to scholarship - while you're committed to reading your bible. This is beyond your scope.

. Which part was the circle at? Where you claimed Njoki used her own staff because you saw a video of a judge somewhere with two staffers? Did it herself? Then gave an asinine analogy about DNA evidence that doesn't remotely deal with this? Or was it the bit where you demonstrated you have no idea what evidence is, who can make a determination on it? Was that the part where you were drawing circles with your mbing brain, Pundit? Maybe it was when you opened your exclusive dictionary of insults from choo to hurl at everyone who disagrees with you? That part I saw.

[Kadame10]

Start from this thread. If you don't even realize it then you're worse off than you think. Ask Robina or Vooke to help you. They seem to have the patiences to gladly suffer fools. I don't. It my main weakness. You claim Njoki introduced new evidence...which is false..because all she did was to verify allegations made by Raila against copies of form 34s that were furnished to her immediately Raila filled her petition. And she found the copies were okay -signed, stamped and seriliazed - while SCOK registar found the originals to be unsigned, unstamped and unseriliazed...and hence the big dilemma we find ourselves as observers in Nipate.

Was that the link where you ran circles with your mbing brain? 

So we observers are supposed to replace the trial court where this should have been adduced, challenged and the court made its finding after all that? Stop bragging about your brain and hurling insults. Chema chajiuza baba. That dilemma on nipate is what the entire litigation process is intended to avoid.

[RV Pundit]

I don't brag - as of class 2 I knew I had a special brain.My advice - go to facebook and make bimbo remarks - otherwise take my advice - read up on election laws,regulations and petition proceedings..before you waste more of my time. Being obstinate while pushing nonsense and seeking support from fellow NASArites is not what I do.

So we observers are supposed to replace the trial court where this should have been adduced, challenged and the court made its finding after all that? Stop bragging about your brain and hurling insults. Chema chajiuza baba. That dilemma on nipate is what the entire litigation process is intended to avoid.

[Kadame10]

I even doubt you know nothing- I somewhat remember you claiming to have read law but maybe a BA or those dodgy law degrees from KEMU.

You see before we proceed... I want you to tell us honestly if you have read
1) Constitution - sections that deal with presidency and elections.
2) Election Act of 2011/2016 - and all the ammendments thereof
3) IEBC act
4) IEBC regulations
5) Supreme court Act & regulation regarding petitions.

Once we are clear on those - we can proceed.

Like I said some of us are committed to scholarship - while you're committed to read your bible. This is beyond your scope.

. Which part was the circle at? Where you claimed Njoki used her own staff because you saw a video of a judge somewhere with two staffers? Did it herself? Then gave an asinine analogy about DNA evidence that doesn't remotely deal with this? Or was it the bit where you demonstrated you have no idea what evidence is, who can make a determination on it? Was that the part where you were drawing circles with your mbing brain, Pundit? Maybe it was when you opened your exclusive dictionary of insults from choo to hurl at everyone who disagrees with you? That part I saw.

No one cares two cents what you think about your own "scholarship", IQ, or brain size. Get that through your damn mind. Just argue your points. I sell fish for a living and dropped out in standard two, mkay? Still doesn't make your claims any less wrong.