I note that Pundit says she has a right to scrutinize the forms. I think as a judge that is not straightforward. For starters she is not an expert. Even if she were such an expert, her findings like all expert opinion must be subject to interrogation and cross examination. The parties must have a chance to be heard. If she carried out an examination, it is unilateral and no party got a chance to interrogate it.
Now will she be a witness? If she had brought up the matter in plenary, would she testify to it?
This is highly irregular and it amounts to a judge deviating seriously from the established civil procedure. It is misconduct. But I will await her written crap.
That is what is even more baffling. She somehow chose to scrutinize forms on her own when even Moses Kulia opted for counting of fake ballots in Kasarani. Then she uses that as a basis for a SCOK judgement? Where did she find the time to scrutinize forms and write her judgement?