Francis Nyenze Won with 54%

[vooke]

Yes Pundito,
Patterns are a fishing expedition.
Any aspirant on the ballot wins or loses by any percentage from 0% to 100%. If there are two strong candidates, none gets past 60% and none gets below 40%.

Look at this asinine theory; first assume Uhuru's 54% is artificial, then next, assume that it was impossible for some specific winners to garner a similar proportion.

Note no reason is given for this.
Why did Mutua get 53% and not Joho's/Nanok's rivals?
A.Uthamaki wanted Mutua to win but not Joho
B. It was impossible or difficult to rig Joho/Nanok out

The theory is based in faith. It's that stage of grief called bargaining if I'm not mistaken.


I can entertain rigging claims in the heart of Kiambu but how on earth do you rig in your opponent's strongholds like Nyamira when everyone is eyeballing you and you don't even have agents in the stations?

NASWA wishes or prays for a barrage of petitions to further justify their claims but the so called victims of 54% are not idiots; they won't waste more of their mullah. NASWA would never pay for any other petition

[Omollo]

It has not produced the same results. Until we have access to the logs and by that the algorithm we can only decipher it from the outcome or the tell-take signs of it. If you had been a real IT expert and not some data entry clerk, you would also notice the same "classic" indicators of the existence of the algorithm.

Like I stated NOT all the areas were targeted. If you had paid attention to what I wrote about it BEFORE it happened you would have caught the areas I pointed out. Only one was not affected.

About Chirchir: You inadvertently confirmed Safaricom's role in the rigging. Now I think the Man-in-the middle claim was real.

Why would an algorithm produce the same results and expose itself; unless it was coded by an idiot. If you analyse 2013 results and 2017 I am sure you'll not see any difference. If you're looking for a pattern; you'll get one. The same way many people have been spoting Jesus on trees, stones, dreams and etc.

The vooke line of argument is typical of Uthamaki. Their tactic is to sow doubt on an obvious and visible fact. They have launched a two pronged attack. On one hand the propaganda casting doubt and making anybody talking about it appear stupid and unreasonable. On the other leading the discussion on the "results" as if there was an election.

You can see Uhuru convening parliament while denying he ever abused state resources in campaigns. The petition just shows we are dealing with infidels who have lost the right to any protections. They should be dealt with mercilessly.

[Omollo]

There is nothing worth responding to here. Mostly muratina bar-level talk.

Yes Pundito,
Patterns are a fishing expedition.
Any aspirant on the ballot wins or loses by any percentage from 0% to 100%. If there are two strong candidates, none gets past 60% and none gets below 40%.

Look at this asinine theory; first assume Uhuru's 54% is artificial, then next, assume that it was impossible for some specific winners to garner a similar proportion.

Note no reason is given for this.
Why did Mutua get 53% and not Joho's/Nanok's rivals?
A.Uthamaki wanted Mutua to win but not Joho
B. It was impossible or difficult to rig Joho/Nanok out

The theory is based in faith. It's that stage of grief called bargaining if I'm not mistaken.


I can entertain rigging claims in the heart of Kiambu but how on earth do you rig in your opponent's strongholds like Nyamira when everyone is eyeballing you and you don't even have agents in the stations?

NASWA wishes or prays for a barrage of petitions to further justify their claims but the so called victims of 54% are not idiots; they won't waste more of their mullah. NASWA would never pay for any other petition

[RV Pundit]

Uber-nonsense.

It has not produced the same results. Until we have access to the logs and by that the algorithm we can only decipher it from the outcome or the tell-take signs of it. If you had been a real IT expert and not some data entry clerk, you would also notice the same "classic" indicators of the existence of the algorithm.

Like I stated NOT all the areas were targeted. If you had paid attention to what I wrote about it BEFORE it happened you would have caught the areas I pointed out. Only one was not affected.

About Chirchir: You inadvertently confirmed Safaricom's role in the rigging. Now I think the Man-in-the middle claim was real.

Why would an algorithm produce the same results and expose itself; unless it was coded by an idiot. If you analyse 2013 results and 2017 I am sure you'll not see any difference. If you're looking for a pattern; you'll get one. The same way many people have been spoting Jesus on trees, stones, dreams and etc.

The vooke line of argument is typical of Uthamaki. Their tactic is to sow doubt on an obvious and visible fact. They have launched a two pronged attack. On one hand the propaganda casting doubt and making anybody talking about it appear stupid and unreasonable. On the other leading the discussion on the "results" as if there was an election.

You can see Uhuru convening parliament while denying he ever abused state resources in campaigns. The petition just shows we are dealing with infidels who have lost the right to any protections. They should be dealt with mercilessly.