M-Akiba bonds are cheaper for government than treasury bonds. So the governments gets cheaper loans while savers get better return than fixed deposits. After all banks just take regular deposits and buy tbills while paying depositors measly deposit rates. Eventually M-Akiba should not only diversify government credit option but lower overall rates. If government can borrow directly from its citizen ala uncle Sam bonds the banks would be forced to lend to private sector to make money.
The onus is on banks especially investments banks to come up with innovative ways of lending to private sector by introducing junk bonds pegged to M-Akiba, the CMA needs to relax debt listing rules to make it easier. Also we need securitization law to make easier to bundle loans together.
The problem with exclusively borrowing in international markets is currency risk. An influx $8b(annual budget deficit) not driven by trade would strengthen the Ksh. decimating tourism, horticulture and manufacturing. Also if ksh. weakens by 10% it becomes more expensive to pay back and from there its a cascading effect. The key is to have both local and international.
The trouble with M-Akiba is that it siphons money from the limited savings/deposits pool - which the banks need to lend and consumers to spend. It is a poor substitute for t-bonds/bills. If M-Akiba succeeds, the banks will not have money for SMEs at all and retail will suffer, at least the fraction now in GoK hands.
We appreciate the necessity of local & international debt mix. The elephant in the room remains - forex rate, GDP, inflation, etc are stable - but private sector continues to suffer. US private sector is massive, robust and cannot be comparable to Kenya - ours must be nurtured by GoK. This is the trouble with reforms - brace for the impact.
Perhaps the reforms should be staggered? Interest caps, CBK bad debt rules, real estate taxes, M-Akiba, etc. We can have a stimulus package.