Android pay and the tap and pay wireless debit card tap and pay system is convenient and fast. Crucially, all transactions are recorded including small change sandwich buys etc.
I can confidently say that my expenditure is 98% cashless. I have more Kenyan shillings and dollars at home than I have Sterling.
Mine too is close to that. But it doesn't require Android Pay, Samsung Pay, or any other kind of Pay. In almost all places, a
debit card will do. That's why I don't understand your complicated system of this-and-that-Pay, Mastercard, and Bitcoin thrown in for good measure. Seems unnecessarily complicated.
The advantage of the prepaid mastercard especially the one I travel with is that I can define multiple currencies (normally local to the country I am traveling to) and pay using local rates. The main exchange rate will be the prevailing bitcoin exchange rate. When I get back I just switch back to bit coin and wait for the next trip and do the same again.
I'm not convinced that there is necessarily a benefit there. Let's say you buy your prepaid thing or bitcoin thing at a rate of US$1 = KSH 100. At the time you arrive in Nyalunga, the rate is US$1 = KSH 120. Would you have been better off just carrying dollars in your pocket? The fact that the prepaid is in the local currency and that things are paid for in the local currency does not make one immune to the vagaries of exchange rates. Am I missing something here?
The tap and pay contactless payments facilitated by android pay and now mastercard etc is that it negates the minimum transaction requirement, and authorisation is almost instant. I now do not need to carry change for incidentals, not even car parking.
I don't understand why you are so focused on Android Pay and Mastercard when it comes to tap-and-pay contactless (or with contact) payment. What so special bout them? Almost all places with a good banking system have tap-and-pay for just about any kind of card, and cards don't come more basic than the good, old-fashioned debit card.
I also don't understand this "minimum transaction requirement"". Retailers are free to impose whatever they like, but I don't see it as something to do with the card itself.
Generally speaking Bitcoin is my universal currency and I switch to whatever currency as I please.
Fair enough. But are you sure that somebody is not taking a slice (however small) off the top when you switch currencies? And are you sure that you are really ahead of those who rely on more traditional methods for currency changes?
MPesa, although a novel idea, is much too localised in Kenya for my liking.
True. But it looks great for Kenya and places with similar banking systems. (RV Pundit is quite right---MPESA has been fantastic in Kenya---although he over-estimates its worth and confuses the convenience of easy money transfers with the need for solutions to more fundamental problems.)
Besides, the price increase in bitcoin has made it the best performing currency of 2016.
Looks like it. And how much of the world's currency is in bitcoins? The world is full of money-hungry people. How many are rushing into "the best performing currency"?
To my mind, the best thing---and probably the only thing of real lasting value---of bitcoins is the idea of "crypto-currency". That will be taken up by many others, but my guess is that Bitcoin is too "damaged" for that (Mt. Gox).