This may sound bad until you read stats from other countries in Africa and in developed world including the US. This can only make sense if you're comparing kenya to another country.
Actually if you look at that report, the primary-school figures I have come right after a commentary on SAQMEQ III results (which are about other countries as well). On secondary school performance, on the other hand, an absolute statement is given: 75% not being able to hack is simply considered "poor quality", and the 8-4-4 system is dragged in, by way of explanation.
The point remain Kenya has without doubt one of best education system in Africa and is up there in world ranking. It can go to Singapore or Shanghai standard with more and more investment. This is one such timely investment.
You've found me in a good mood today, so let me continue with my educational exercise. On your "
best in Africa", we'll skip the bit about how the data (SAQMEQ etc.) you provided at various links above is limited to
15 countries and two regions in Africa. Nor should it be necessary to again point out the limitations of "
best of the worst". Note this:
The quality of education in the 15 countries is still poor
Your link:
http://www.nation.co.ke/News/Kenyan+pupils+top+in+Africa+/-/1056/1286490/-/view/printVersion/-/wta2f3/-/index.htmlIn other words, Kenya is doing well among 15 countries with crappy education systems. That doesn't sound like something worth a lot of excitement.
The preceding is another point that will probably be too subtle for you, but I encourage you to persevere and try to understand it. In general, try to put a little effort into understanding just what it is that you are reading and how to interpret it both "in place" and in wider context.
Let's move on.
The WEF survey under discussion has several questions on perceptions. According to you those, regardless of the nature of the question, somehow indicate objective rankings on quality. Kenya has several "rankings" in education that place it as numbers 36, 63, 84, etc. You have picked on the no. 36 one to claim that Kenya's education system is the top 40 worldwide ... that's the one with the question:
In your country, how well does the education system meet the needs of a competitive economy? (1 = not well at all; 7 = extremely well)
According to your interpretation, Kenya therefore has better education than Austria, Taiwan, Israel, South Korea, etc. Really? Never mind. Let me give you a specific example that will perhaps clarify things for you.
According to your bizarre interpretation on that one question, the quality of education in Indonesia is (at "rank" 41) is better than that of Taiwan (at "rank" 46) and South Korea (at "rank" 66). I don't think one needs to look at the data to see how bizarre that conclusion is. But I'll give you some data anyway.
On the PISA tests, the rankings are as follows:
TAIWAN: Maths - 7, Science - 13, Reading - 7
SOUTH KOREA: Maths - 5, Science - 7, Reading - 6
INDONESIA: Maths - 64, Science - 64, Reading - 60
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Programme_for_International_Student_AssessmentBy the way, while people are spilling seed over how GoK/Jubilee is "doing great" by dishing out laptops and tablets, and there is plenty of
kula nyama, there's the lead article of today's online
Daily Nation, on some very basic things. This one:
http://www.nation.co.ke/newsplex/Hunger/2718262-3419114-uxt5piz/index.html