We started paying for the railway long time ago...with about 25-40b annually ...collected from railway dev levy that every importer and exporter pays.. with our revised GDP, our debts are sustainable.
The Railway Development Levy came into existence in 2013 (
Finance Act 2013, No. 38 of 2013). So there have been only 2 years of collection ... not what I would call "long time ago". Also, exporters do not pay; the act states that
The levy shall be at the rate of 1.5 percent of the customs value of the goods and shall be paid by the importer of such goods at the time of entering the goods for home use.
RV Pundit:
pretty much...find out how much we have collected from "railway development levy"...RDL..if we collect 1.5% of the import value...nearly 1.5-2 trillion...then this can be self-financing..without the need to chip in our taxes. RDL can easily collect 30-40B annually.....and that in 15 yrs....can repay the loan.It only fair that those who use the railway line to import and export stuff pay for it.....so we don't burden somebody in Mandera who care less about the railway.
I see several issues with that optimistic scenario:
First, the 1.5% levy is only in "goods imported for
home use", not on all imported goods.
Second, the levy has nothing to do with "who uses the railway"; it simply adds a tax to goods in a certain category, regardless of where they go and how they get there. "Home goods" that arrive in Mombasa and end up in Mandera---by road or camel---are taxed in the same manner as similar goods that end up, via train, in Nairobi. On the other hand, as I have noted above, exporters don't pay that levy, regardless of their use of the railway.
Third, customs duties are in the category of "easy prediction" and "easy collection", the latter being from the fact that the importer must pay at the time of goods-entry. KRA, by looking at past trends of whatever is imported in that category, should be able to easily make good predictions of what it can reasonably expect to collect. And collection ought not to be a large problem; therefore the difference between "target" and "collected" ought to be small.
Fourth (if I recall correctly): KRA's target for 2013/2014 was Sh 20 billion; for 2014/2015 it was Sh 22 billion. I believe both targets were missed and "collected" was less (although not by huge amounts). So:
- I don't see how "
RDL can easily collect 30-40B annually" when it is barely managing to get easily predictable and easily collectable amounts that are well below that range.
- A substantial improvement over current rates cannot be achieved through "better collection", because there is almost no room there. On the other hand, KRA cannot make Kenyans suddenly import 1.5 to 2 times what they require for "home use".