And what do we stand to lose in this perception game exactly! As long as Kenyan althetes are allowed to compete; nothing.
Once again, you have neatly captured Athletics Kenya's attitude. Why has a person like Rudisha has, even before this, had some strong words on the matter?
We could go back and forth, arguing about whether perceptions matter, but the fact is that they do.
And not just in athletics. What's more, perceptions frequently have concrete consequences, regardless of whether fair or not.
Nothing stops Chicago Marathon from demanding random testings before and after as condition to getting the price money.
True. Other than the fact that people won't be keen to pay to watch "dope fiends", let us consider the case of someone like Jeptoo. One may argue that the organizers of this of that marathon should have tested her, but there she is: out in the cold. And the marathon organizers?
You cannot punish athletes thanks to AK ineptitude.
Nobody is proposing anything of the sort. What people like Rudisha, and others whose opinions cannot be easily dismissed, are pointing out is that AK's incompetence leads to a situation where all are tarred with the same brush.
And there is no much we can do about AK or IAAF.
Perhaps not about the IAAF. But who actually pays for AK? Why can Kenyans not insist that AK do a better job at monitoring those that it selects to represent Kenya on the international stage?
Kenyans should be proud of their success.....sour grapes or not.
Kenyans should indeed be proud. But sour grapes on whose part? Dope-up Kenyans have been caught at the World Championships, and it has caused a stir all over. Would it have been different if Jamaicans or Americans or ... were the ones that got caught?