Nope. Africa have too much problems to grapple it.The developed world have the moral obligation and resources to do more.They can do that by using Interpol if need be to track the human traffickers.
Europeans have to rescue those people by watching the sea.....in either side of the shore.
They cannot refuse to rescue people ostensibly because they'll end up in Italy or Europe.
Kenya host 450K refugees...Italy can build a refugee camp by that shore.
I think you misunderstand my point. So let me do respond in easy steps:
(1) Yes, let us agree they have a moral obligation to help and they have the resources to do more. But that does not mean that they will do so---the mere assertion of moral obligation does not automatically translate into action--and in the meantime people continue to die in that sea. That is the immediate problem that needs to be addressed; and that can be done even while the wailing about moral obligations continues at top volume.
(2) It is strange to say they
cannot refuse to rescue people. They
can, and the proof of it is that they sometimes have.
(3) A refugee camp is not the solution; far better to absorb them in other ways. That is what happens with the far larger numbers that do make it across the sea.
(4) Except in bad movies, Interpol is not a police force in the conventional sense and cannot do all that is required to track down and sort out human traffickers. The real work will have to be done by the police forces in the countries where those traffickers reside or work.
"Interpol is not a supranational law enforcement agency and has no agents who are able to make arrests. Instead, it is an international organization that functions as a network of criminal law enforcement agencies from different countries. The organization thus functions as an administrative liaison among the law enforcement agencies of the member countries, providing communications and database assistance, assisted via the central headquarters in Lyon, France."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interpol