My comments elsewhere on
The Great Wall of Kenya:
http://jukwaa.proboards.com/thread/9312/construct-somalia-border-prevent-terrorWe have a situation of a porous border that we cannot control and also panya routes that allow terrorists loaded with money to come and bribe Kenyan police. Good general Nkaissery comes up with the idea of a wall on the Kenyan/Somali border and there is an avalanche of criticism including suggestions of how the general's brains have moved south and reside in his arse.
Criticism is actually a good thing, but someone told me that when you criticise, also offer a suggestion that is better than what you are criticizing !
See
red above. Do they also pay bribes to get into the country, or is their money good only once they are in the country? If the former, then the wall will do what?
Will the entire length of this wall be patrolled at all times? If not, then presumably people will be able to go over it, under it, or blow holes in it. If the entire length of that border-wall will be patrolled at all times, then why isn't such patrolling already happening?
I also note that the general is proposing a 200km-wall, but the Kenyan-Somali border is 680 km. Is there a reason why the would-be terrorists would not use the remaining,
clear 480 km ?
Better suggestions, as requested:
(a) Tackle the well-known corruption in the Kenyan police force; really tackle it, not just give "reminders and warnings", as the president calls them. No country can properly deal with criminality when its own police force is full of criminals
(b) KDF to get out of the charcoal business and return to its main function of protecting the country.
(c) Deal with the underlying problems that encourage terrorism, problems of whose creation the government has played a major role.
Anyways ... I don't see this 200km wall happening. The general probably just wanted to show that he has an idea and figures that, for that purpose, even a stupid one is better than none.