Legal absurdity.
Courts can only declare impeachment null and void.
They are not the court in this case - to slice and dice how it went.
RiggyG was tried by Senate. Senate was the COURT in the case.
They can only approve or disapprove the impeachment.
Only way is in 2028 - then they can say impeachment was null and void - but because 2022-20237 ended- RiggyG is eligble to run.
Realistically how RiggyG escape this is beyond me.
Senate & Parliament followed the laws and procedures strictly - unlike before in earlier impeachment like Wambora case;
Whenever RiggyG got something thrown - they waited - they unlocked it.
It been hard post Wambora to escape impeachment because now people obey court orders, ensure they tick all the boxes, and you're left with merit & demerits of the case - which court cannot go into -as parliament is the court here.
RiggyG is gone.
False dichotomy. Courts can declare illegality without overturning the process. Such that Riggy becomes eligible for office but not get the job back.
This is what I see happening.