Yues Senate hawks Call Ruto Allegiance to Kung Fu FP Fumble Strategic Error

[gout]

• Tweet

Many African nations maintain troubling ties with China, including key national security partners. Just last month, President Ruto declared Kenya a major non-NATO ally, while at the same time, China and Kenya appear as co-architects of a so-called new world order. This is not merely alignment with China—it signals allegiance. The speech that outlines this development will be submitted for the record at the conclusion of the hearing.

Relying on leaders who openly embrace Beijing is a strategic error. It is time to reassess the United States' relationship with Kenya and other nations that are forging close bonds with China. This is not only about embracing China but also about endorsing the concept of a "new world order."

Still, there remain countries where meaningful engagement is possible—but only if approached with sober judgment and clear-eyed realism. U.S. policy in Africa must shift away from focusing on individual leaders and instead prioritize the strengthening of institutions, expansion of private sector partnerships, and empowerment of the region’s youthful and dynamic populations.

This hearing takes place at a moment of both profound urgency and real opportunity. By aligning our strategy and expenditures with the true potential of our regional partners, we can forge stronger, mutually beneficial relationships that advance both African progress and U.S. national interests—ultimately making America safer, stronger, and more prosperous.

[gout]

Watching President Ruto stand alongside Chinese officials, speaking about a "new world order," is deeply unsettling, especially considering the extensive work the United States has invested in the region. The original world order, constructed after World War II, was led by the U.S. and democratic, capitalist nations that value human rights. In contrast, the "new world order" being discussed today appears driven by autocratic regimes—communist and socialist states that show little regard for human rights. It is alarming to see countries expressing interest in joining or promoting this alternative vision, given that the existing order, while imperfect, has served the world far better than what would emerge under authoritarian influence.

One reason for this shift may lie in how the U.S. engages in Africa. Our approach often centers on individual leaders rather than national institutions, making our efforts vulnerable to political shifts. This individual-centric model seems especially pronounced in Africa.

[RV Heavy Hitter!]

The senator should address Trump's embrace of China, the Middle East, Russia, North Korea, Syria, and other countries that never value human rights. How can you impose tariffs of over 10% on Kenya and other countries and expect them to remain stationary? They have to look for allies all over! Just listen to the whole foreign relations committee, and you can tell Africa is only talked about in terms of US resources and how China is eating their lunch in raw materials/minerals. The East and the west need Africa more than Africa needs them. The west is just poor, but better in managing their resources!

[Nefertiti]

The US (and generally the West) is accustomed to neocolonial approach to Africa and the Global South in the ended unipolar period. That is how you have a transactional  Trump ripping off the Gulf states and calling it diplomacy. It seems for the right amount he is ready to change any policy- Israel's problem is they are used to receiving the goodies which won't cut with Trump.

The West must re-learn how approach a multipolar world.

For Kenya: Trump would have to undo the tariffs, restore AGOA, restore USAID, restore Haiti deal, etc. Otherwise he has nothing to offer Ruto compared to Xi Jinping.