I was restricting myself to engineering. There could be top-notch/elite US engineering schools that do not require the GRE for admission to grad school, but, off the top of my head, I can't imagine any. Can you provide a list?
(Also, what is your field and where did you get your first degree?)
I am suprised by this MK. Professional bodies have always been involved in higher learning that is now new to the Kenyan situation. consider this:
"The U.S. Department of Education (DOE) does not accredit institutions; rather, it determines which accrediting agencies receive recognition by the Department. This means that the standards of the accrediting agencies are up to par to the standards of the DOE. The DOE limits its official recognition to accrediting agencies that endorse schools that need the recognition to participate in federal programs, such as the Federal Student Financial Aid Program
Once again, my focus is on the accreditation of engineering programs. Also, nowhere did I suggest that professional bodies in the USA (or anywhere else) do not get involved in what is studied in universities. Rather, my comment was about
the manner in which they get involved and to what extent.
Please note that I never suggested that DOE accredits anybody; rather, I referred to "professional organizations". Let us consider electrical engineering, for example. In the USA, the relevant bodies are ABET and IEEE. You can read about those here:
http://www.abet.org/accreditation/http://www.ieee.org/education_careers/education/accreditation/index.htmlIf you read through all that, the point I was trying to make is quite clear: the accreditation of particular program is a process that universities get into voluntarily; it is not the type of thing that EBK is trying to impose. The IEEE webpage puts that right upfront:
"
Accreditation is the voluntary, peer review process utilized by higher education institutions and industry practitioners to evaluate academic degree programs."and ABET devotes pages into trying to sell what they do, i.e. why accreditation matters. ABET is especially important, in the USA and elsewhere, and this example page indicates why:
http://www.engr.ncsu.edu/academics/undergrad/profengr/(I picked it because it is a good example of a university program preparing its students to pass the professional exams.)
The point, however, is this: ABET can (and it sometimes does) refuse to accredit degree programs; and it can (and frequently does) offer advice on curriculum. What it cannot do, and never does, is insist that certain programs be suspended or shut-down, which, as I understand it, is what EBK has somehow managed to do.
Now, don't get me wrong. I appreciate and agree with your concerns that started this thread. As far as I can tell, the quality of university education in Kenya has largely gone to the dogs---even at UoN. I am all for EBK getting involved in the education of engineers. What I have an "issue" with is the manner of their involvement (as it appears to be the case). The autonomy of universities is something that needs to be handled "delicately", and places like Kenya provide numerous examples for the "why".
So, when you write
This is how most public universities started engineering courses even without enough lecturers or qualified ones. The matter has been worsened by the rapid expansion of universities, with their constituent colleges fast becoming full universities even without the necessary staff and equipment. This is what has forced EBK to weigh in in a bid to ensure professionalism
I fully agree, and some my earlier statements will confirm that. I also agree that EBK should---and, indeed, must---weigh in. What I have doubts about is the manner of the "weighing in". Advice on what is to be studied? TICK! Refusal to register sub-standard "engineers"? TICK! But how it manages to get programs suspended/shut-down is another matter. Are there similar examples ("historical" otherwise in the USA?)