There is no basis for this ban (on LHD) and certainly not on the 8 year rule. These rules should be challenged in court.
Why ban Kenyans from driving LHD but allow Rwanda, Burundi and DRC vehicles to drive on the same roads. If it is a question of safety, then prove to me that Kenyans as a genetic group are predisposed to cause serious accidents when driving LHDs than RHDs? Its all hogwash. The two rules have the same reasoning behind it.
1. The new car market is now at home with competition arising from Japanese and UK used cars. Cars that are under 8 years old are almost as expensive as the poor quality contraptions they peddle in Kenya. Remove the 8 year rule and you end up with used cars of high quality that are sinfully cheap. It would put them out of business
2. The has been a drop in prices of used European cars over the years. You can buy a mercedes for under USD 1000 in Europe. That would spell disaster to the local dealers of poor quality contraband. In between fleecing the government, they need an occasional bank financed local buyer. They have no chance if this person can get a cheap Germany Merc LHD.
3. Insistence on documentation is to deter importers from changing LHD to RHD before export. Such a move would most likely not be approved in the country of origin and there would consequently be no certificate of roadworthiness.
These are just tricks which as I said elsewhere need to be checked by whoever is in charge of checking monopolies and unfair trade between businesses.