Netters that Interferred with ICC

[KenyanPlato]

• Tweet

1. True RV - He was the link between Itumbi and local Kalenjin Militias. What happend? True Rv is under investigation by ICC and he has had his online activities banned

2. RV Pundit - He used his IT skills to hack and track down activists in Eldoret. Today when you mention witness interfering he goes quite. He fed this information to Ruto and Sang teams. He was the chief propagandist using his hacking skills to intimidate akina Ken Wafula.  You will finally get your own medicine

3. GEMA bloggers - Those idiots akina late Amused. They were very vocal against indictment of Uhuru.

To the victims of PEV. Fuck these goons that have continued to deny your justice and mock your effort to get justice

[RV Pundit]

My friend I will never be party to any activity that deny anyone justice.
PEV victims deserve justice.
But not fake show trial based on fake evidence.
Ocampo was fed BS - that WERE DISMISSED wholesale by judges without Ruto or Sang having to defend themselves.
The BS were from PNU guys - who engineered tall stories that were so incredulous.
That Ruto was issuing guns in his maize store in public meeting.
And other fake stories that got some of us really intrigued.
Our role as NetCitizens was to uncover the truth.
We did our best.
I believe the victims are better off than if we had a show trial for it's sake.

The person most responsible for PEV was one MWAI KIBAKI.

Don't ever blame other people moron when the guy most responsible for triggering it by engaging in most brazen rigging and worse for failing to protect the victims life and properties is out there in Muthaiga.

ICC was meant to catch Kibaki and Raila - not GICHERU - who is Gicheru?

Let them come for Kibaki and Raila if they need to balance things. Then we will be on the right track.

[Kadudu]

I agree with your accusations on Kibaki, but what was Raila's crime?

My friend I will never be party to any activity that deny anyone justice.
PEV victims deserve justice.
But not fake show trial based on fake evidence.
Ocampo was fed BS - that WERE DISMISSED wholesale by judges without Ruto or Sang having to defend themselves.
The BS were from PNU guys - who engineered tall stories that were so incredulous.
That Ruto was issuing guns in his maize store in public meeting.
And other fake stories that got some of us really intrigued.
Our role as NetCitizens was to uncover the truth.
We did our best.
I believe the victims are better off than if we had a show trial for it's sake.

The person most responsible for PEV was one MWAI KIBAKI.

Don't ever blame other people moron when the guy most responsible for triggering it by engaging in most brazen rigging and worse for failing to protect the victims life and properties is out there in Muthaiga.

ICC was meant to catch Kibaki and Raila - not GICHERU - who is Gicheru?

Let them come for Kibaki and Raila if they need to balance things. Then we will be on the right track.

[RV Pundit]

Apart from allowing himself to be rigged; I cannot think of any; As far as we know ODM called for mass action; unless it was code word for violence; it appears ODM did publicly encourage demos and condemned violence; Ruto did appear so many times to call for peace and codemn violence; But everytime he appeared on TV; violence would increase; PNU thought he was using some coded language.

Obviously an argument can be made that ODM (mostly Raila) did foster 41-1 - that set the stage - for kikuyus to be hunted.

But obviously Kibaki also did attempt to kikunize the gov - so it's all fair politics.

Ultimately Kibaki ought to pay for crimes of commission and omission. As long as Kibaki remains untouchable - the victims can forget about justice.

I agree with your accusations on Kibaki, but what was Raila's crime?

[Nefertiti]

In public everyone called for peace including Uhuru while mobilizing Mungiki complete with cash, guns, army uniforms and trucks. Safe passage to Naivasha and Nakuru to behead or circumcize innocent Luo.

According to witnesses who later recanted or disappeared - Mobutu Kalejin network had elaborate structure of Cherambosses reporting to him - and downwards to Ken Braziz Wekesas and finally womb-splitting warriors.

That CAH 101 regardless of Kibaki and Raila political responsibility. It good ICC merely postponed the cases until the goons leave office... which keep them in their best behavior. These other Njamba news of Pundits helping Gicheru corrupt witnesses - I don't put it beyond you but I don't know.

[RV Pundit]

Ruto sang case was summarily dismissed..not suspended.Uhuru trial was suspended.

[Nefertiti]

Ruto sang case was summarily dismissed..not suspended.Uhuru trial was suspended.

Blinkers.. did you corrupt witnesses or not? Don't skirt the subject.

[RV Pundit]

Uhuru case never kicked off. After the opening statements - it died the following day - or so for lack of evidence - for what Ocampo say was witness and kenya gov lack of co-operation. No trial. No judgement.  A mistrial. The proceedings are suspended.

Ruto/Sang case- Trial was conducted. Prosecutor Ocampo presented his case - for almost 1yr - but the case collapsed on it's weight - without key witnesses to link Ruto to horrific crimes the prosecution had laid.

At end of prosecutor case - like in Kenya - those charged can apply for "NO CASE" to answer. That basically means the prosecution has totally failed to link the accused to the criminal activity and the defendant has no case to defend. He doesn't have to call witnesses. A judgement of NOT GUILTY is entered. The case is dismissed.

In kenya it's under criminal procedure law 306

“When the evidence of the witnesses for the prosecution has been concluded, the court, if it considers that there is no evidence that the accused or any one of several accused committed the offence, shall after hearing, if necessary, any arguments which the advocate for the prosecution or the defence may desire to submit recording a finding of not guilty. (2) When the evidence of the witnesses for the prosecution has been concluded the court, if it considers that there is evidence that the accused person or any one or more of several accused persons committed the offence, shall inform each such accused person of his right to address the court on his own behalf or make unsworn statement and to call witnesses in his defence…...”

Blinkers.. did you corrupt witnesses or not? Don't skirt the subject.