Moreover, when they were telling people that the church is against majimbo, it was a misrepresentation. The church's social doctrine is basically devolution. Some people call it "distributism" because it's basically that whatever can be done at the lowest level of authority, closest to the ground, should be done at that level and not taken to the higher levels unnecessarily. Isn't that devolution? Several Popes have written encyclicals about it. So if the church were going to take a position on the matter, (It did not, either in 2007 or this time), the pro-devolution side would've been far closer to church teaching than the pro-centralization crowd. Yet Cardinal seemed to have opposite views and then presented them as the church's views, that seemed very strange to me.