Ethnic radio stations and tv are very influential, its the reason why kenyatta bought mediamax in 2010 or there about.
Who said they and the others are not influential? Their so called influence has been greater than it is today. It is just that radios and TVs are losing out. It is not just Kenya. It is a world wide reality as mobile phones, the internet etx kick in.
I am sure Pundit still buries himself in that attic to read old newspapers. In the meantime many young people actually look down upon newspapers on newsprint. They are forced to buy to look for government job ads where they cannot find them online.
The influence of vernacular stations (Vernacular being itself a full fledged derogatory term) was limited even before the current decline. For starters, the linguistic barrier guaranteed that such stations could not extend beyond their geographical catchment areas. Thus Kameme could broadcast nationally and reach every corner of Kenya. It would not be any different from the NAZI radio broadcasting in German all over Africa or BBC broadcasting to Germans in English.
That said, I see a red herring in your responses (Pundit and his Kikuyu sidekick HK):
The issue I addressed is not the one being responded to. The issues being "responded" to was never really raised by me.
Let me break down my position:
1. Yes, one can have total control over the media
2. One can own media houses
3. One can influence voters using his own media houses
4. But that would not change the electoral outcomes
Elections in Kenya are rigged. Raila could have owned KBC, KTN, Citizen, K24, Radio Maisha and even Radio Kifo... it would not have made him win in 2007, 2013 or 2017.
In 2017 Uhuru went ahead to shut down media that he doubted would obey his orders to to transmit Raila's swearing in. That should demonstrate to anybody - even HK - that the so called influence of the vernacular radios is of no consequence.
Controlling the mass media makes sense where there is functioning democracy and respect for the individual and collective vote.