Where a form lacks;
1. The signature of the Returning Officer
2. security features
3. accuracy by misrepresenting the figures from Form 34A
It is by law a forgery whose contents are null and void.
The problem with Jubilee is they have their own case which for some reason they failed to present. They concentrated on a non existent case. May be it is because every time they tried to respond to the NASA case the failed miserably and exposed themselves.
Pundit familiarize yourself with Raila's petition and pay heed to the pleadings. If you find that he made a claim and failed to prove it, wake me up. Otherwise this recount propaganda is going nowhere. Uhuru did not make an application for a recount (perhaps he was expecting NASA to do so). Uhuru Kenyatta OPPOSED the application to review Forms 34 in its entirety. His agents did not record an significant objections to the findings of the Registrar.
Totally agree. That evidence I haven't seen. I am talking about difference btw text-in data, form 34A and form 34B - transcription errors. I am yet to see this allegation that NASA agent form 34A or 34B - is different from IEBC 34A or 34B.
Pundit, how would different forms than those presented amount to simple "human errors"? If you have two different forms both purporting to be the one form 34A of polling station X, there's no room for human errors. One of them is fake. Or both. Fake isn't simple, clerical or as you say "human" errors, its human interference. What you are talking about is difference in mathematics, not different forms.