"Correlation does not imply causation".
That's the BS NASA is trying to get away with, by making wild accusations that just because the IEBC ran a shoddy election, it automatically implies rigging. It doesn't.
Listen to what Rao is NOT talking about. Therein lies the whole truth of 8.8 and why he avoided 26.10 by making demands he knew couldn't be met within the SCOK deadline. There were a myriad of methods NASA could have used to show actual rigging taking place on 26.10 but NASA wasn't interested.
NASA was never interested in a rerun simply because they knew they'd lost despite the irregularities of the IEBC.
True. 2007 most of the observers promptly proclaimed the rigging. The ODM agents in Nithi had real-vs-cooked results handy.
2017 - no real-vs-cooked results - no particular station. No singing agents. Just photocopied and soiled forms. NASA won on the process but failed to prove rigging which lost them token supporters like myself. At best I thought it was plain negligent to place the burden of proof on the IEBC. At worst I thought they did have their agents' results that showed no rigging.
On the opening of the IEBC server/s. I imagined granting access was unmanageable for a myriad of reasons. For one "server" is an abstract concept. What exactly do you grant access to - the databases? Their logs/backups? The file systems with IEBC docs? What docs? The IEBC network? For two the mess called fumbling can be great propaganda material and can do much harm.
But now it turns out the servers can be accessed by various parties after all - even without court orders!
So it would be good to know why access could not be granted after 8th August.