Author Topic: It Was Justices Murgor, Ouko & Kiage Who Ruled Against the IEBC  (Read 1344 times)

Offline Omollo

  • Moderator
  • Enigma
  • *
  • Posts: 7143
  • Reputation: 13780
  • http://www.omollosview.com
    • Omollosview
Justice Agnes K. Murgor
Justice William Ouko
Justice Patrick Kiage
... [the ICC case] will be tried in Europe, where due procedure and expertise prevail.; ... Second-guessing Ocampo and fantasizing ..has obviously become a national pastime.- NattyDread

Offline Omollo

  • Moderator
  • Enigma
  • *
  • Posts: 7143
  • Reputation: 13780
  • http://www.omollosview.com
    • Omollosview
Re: It Was Justices Murgor, Ouko & Kiage Who Ruled Against the IEBC
« Reply #1 on: June 23, 2017, 11:39:41 PM »
Quote
... [the ICC case] will be tried in Europe, where due procedure and expertise prevail.; ... Second-guessing Ocampo and fantasizing ..has obviously become a national pastime.- NattyDread

Offline MOON Ki

  • Moderator
  • Enigma
  • *
  • Posts: 2667
  • Reputation: 5780
Re: It Was Justices Murgor, Ouko & Kiage Who Ruled Against the IEBC
« Reply #2 on: June 23, 2017, 11:56:04 PM »
Just finished reading the ruling:  http://www.judiciary.go.ke/portal/blog/post/court-of-appeal-judgment-on-presidential-tally-case

It is worth a careful read, because it is very mindful of the context in which all this is taking place---the historical mischief at the "national tallying centre",  the intent of the new constitution, the Kriegler stuff, etc.

Perhaps those who disagree with it will identify those bits they find problematic and on what basis.
MOON Ki  is  Muli Otieno Otiende Njoroge arap Kiprotich
Your True Friend, Brother,  and  Compatriot.

Offline Kichwa

  • Moderator
  • Enigma
  • *
  • Posts: 2886
  • Reputation: 2697
Re: It Was Justices Murgor, Ouko & Kiage Who Ruled Against the IEBC
« Reply #3 on: June 24, 2017, 02:40:12 AM »

Thanks for the Link.  Just finished reading too and it addresses all the issues that we were struggling here with today.  Pundit should take a break from the bar today and read it. It gives one hope in our system at such times.  Its this kind of reasoning that brings confidence to the electoral system.  Maina Kiai and his fellow respondents did this country a great favor by raising this issue with the courts.  I am glad we are going into the 2017 elections far from perfect but with more chance for a free and fair elections than where we were in 2013.

Just finished reading the ruling:  http://www.judiciary.go.ke/portal/blog/post/court-of-appeal-judgment-on-presidential-tally-case

It is worth a careful read, because it is very mindful of the context in which all this is taking place---the historical mischief at the "national tallying centre",  the intent of the new constitution, the Kriegler stuff, etc.

Perhaps those who disagree with it will identify those bits they find problematic and on what basis.
"I have done my job and I will not change anything dead or a live" Malonza