I had a mind to completely ignore this Tribal Bigot. He is the leading propagandist for the bigots. I changed my mind when I realized he was yet another relevant example of what Ndii writes about.
So thick is he that he fails to realize that his response to Ndii amounts to proof of what he (Ndii) is postulating. Let us look at it:
Foggy,
Of course there are all sorts of kikuyu shades of opinions
just like every other ethnicity. There are those who will preach tribal chauvinism because they actually believe it, those who preach it not because they believe it but because it helps them mobilise voters.
In a typical spin he seeks to hide behind subterfuge: Everybody is doing it. If the line of thinking sounds similar to what The Trucker Driver writes it is because it is actually similar. How about those who administer oaths? Do all tribes administer oaths cursing other tribes?
This is where Ndii misses the point- There are those who genuinely feel threatened by those preaching 41 vs 1 and with good reason- they have the scars to show. And this majority will be exploited by the first two for all its worth.
This is what I call the Taiwan Argument: Where Taiwan refused to be independent but lay claim to Mainland China. When Communist China adopted the same policy stating that Taiwan was an estranged province, Taiwan changed tactics. It accuses China of seeking to take her (Taiwan) by force.
Now when Kenyatta oathed Kikuyus it was against all the other tribes. He was in effect isolating Kikuyus. The Rev. Gatu writes in his memoirs that he did warn Kenyatta that such an act would place the Kikuyu in opposition to the other [41] tribes. Gatu further warned of Kenyatta inadvertently forcing the other [41] in an alliance against the Kikuyu.
Can a soldier who gets drunk and shoots himself in the foot blame the enemy?
The Propaganda Bigot then goes ahead to regurgitate discredited propaganda which was manufactured by Kibaki ahead of, during and after PEV. He of course left out the documents (genuine or fake) which Kibaki used to hit at Uhuru for opposing him in 2002 and to pave the way for a different successor. All that crap was created together and disseminated by Kibaki's agents.
The specific one cited was characterized by mistakes (factual and linguistic) and was clearly below the intellectual capacity of those it was claiming to be the authors.
And since you invited me to comment, i urge you to look at this linked document, the authors and strategies and comment on it. Ndii's commentary thus is one-sided.
http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&cd=2&ved=0ahUKEwidwNOy1qjRAhUWOsAKHdx7ACIQFggcMAE&url=http%3A%2F%2Fdownload.cabledrum.net%2Fwikileaks_archive%2Ffile%2Fodm-political-strategy.pdf&usg=AFQjCNHTLCE9To3Zej4Vc7bSZWmey3xENQ
I once heard some bad boys urging their footballers: If you miss the ball do not miss the leg. Here The Propaganda Bigot goes personal on Ndii as the final proof that he attempted to criticize a document that is far beyond his intellectual limit of elasticity.
Ndii and his nocturnal rendezvous with aspiring beauties (probably half his age) will only hurt him so it was silly on his part to wash their dirty linen in public.
Defence Minister Alan Clark once asked reporters who accused him of sleeping with mother and her two daughters: Are you jealous? I wonder where it is written that a man shall not have any relations with a consenting adult woman half his age?
Regarding his comments on Eichmann and Rwanda, I would urge him to stay away from what he doesn't know :| .
Why would Ndii not discuss where the country Kenya is headed? It is the majority Hutu who sparked off the war, did they not? They held power in monopoly, did they not?
They monopolized the media, and virtually captured the state by making sure only Hutus were employed. Is it any surprise that Uhuru has chosen to be friends with Nkurunziza - even assisting him to return to power after the coup? He has conversely become hostile to Kagame - a Tutsi.
I wonder what became of the discussions to assist Besigye - a Muganda - against Museveni.