After the 2010 Katiba came in to being, it became even more clear that CDF was a malignant cancer in the system. So MPs set about curing the cells with chemotherapy. They dressed CDF as a "Donation" from the National Government to the constituency!
Well, the High Court has determined that the so called "cure" in effect poisoned more cells in the body. For starters, while the law recognizes that the National Government may donate funds to the people mashinani, it also establishes a clear channel through which the cash can be shipped - that is County Governments!
Secondly the Court determined that by making the "donation" to the Constituencies, GoK was effectively robbing the County governments.
So in brief the CDF act is dead as dodo - unless they take corrective measures. Now that is the challenge.
For starters, who will make the changes? We have Muturi speaking in Molo (obviously before he read the judgment) assigning the house he controls the power to amend the CDF act to conform with the ruling. He is in for a shock:
1. The High Court clearly stated that any laws affecting the County Governments have to pass through the senate. While Parliament is not barred from contributing, it is up to the senate. And that is going to resurrect an old issue that Muturi would rather see remain buried - Supremacy wars! ( we shall come back to that shortly)
2. Whatever amendment must ensure that MPs lose their powerful and controlling power over the fund and that it is seen to be independent of the MPs and in the control of the Executive (in this case County government).
The last time Muturi allowed a bill to go to the senate, he allowed MPs to strip it of whatever contribution the senators had added so that there was no evidence the bill had passed through the Senate. Now he has another opportunity to recognize the Senate. Will he do it? Will MPs allow changes made to the CDF bill by senators to stand?
There are clear options:
a. They could let them stand
b. The could repeat the stripping exercise
MPs lose either way. If they allow the senate to write the law, at best the senators will write themselves in the CDF and at worst will lock out MPs altogether!
If the opt to strip it as they did before, the matter ends up in court, time runs and by the end of the 12th month, the law dies while awaiting judgement in some court.
The MPs have a way out: they may use the slow moving judiciary to keep CDF alive.
Indeed. I actually didn't know CDF was still going on until rather late. My problem is not so much undermining devolution as the separation of powers: CDF is more executive than legislative, seems to me. An MP is a legislator, not a manager of funds for development at a small unit level of govt. Though I see your point as the House is part of the National govt, not the county. So it's both the national govt and the legislative branch inserting themselves into another government. If we need a mini-management at that level underneath or as part of the county-government, we can do that properly. Devolving the devolved govt a bit further. How does such a ruling sit with the one upholding the continuation of the former provincial structure which truly harms the spirit of devolution, as its the national executive trying to take over/insert itself into the affairs of the county?