I went through the new-and-improved amendments, and I was astonished. Badly thought-out, and the writing is even worse. Consider this funny example you have just given. What exactly does it mean to intentionally intrude on a person's privacy? Are Peeping Toms to be locked up for 20 years?
The worst is what they purport to do to the Constitution. Even in Kenya the Constitution is to be viewed as the supreme law: Article 2 of the same states just that. Now, go through the amendments and count the number of instances of "Constitution shall be limited". Wow. Why bother to change it when you can just "limit" it?
Here is what they have done: where it is immediately obvious that they are going against the Constitution, they claim that these new (and lesser) laws will limit it (the supreme law); elsewhere, they hope nobody notices.
Amazing. Does anyone not see where all this will end up, especially given that Kenya has already been there before? For decades! .... And somewhere there is, I believe, a requirement that these people show that they have been to school (university) and so, presumably, can use their heads. I have come to the conclusion that when it comes to sycophancy and dick-sucking, the African politician is unbeatable and beyond redemption.