Nipate
Forum => Kenya Discussion => Topic started by: vooke on May 23, 2019, 07:46:38 PM
-
I read this article and felt like I just watched Breaking Bad all over again or Battle of Winterfell.
It's about how Liverpool has successfully employed serious but ignored analytics to get to where they @, #2 on EPL and Finalist UCL. Real maths at work
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/05/22/magazine/soccer-data-liverpool.html?smid=fb-nytimes&smtyp=cur
-
Data science or BI is responsible for the growth of the likes of Safaricom and new tech companies. Better decision are made when backed by emperical evidence from data. Private sector have embraced data science. Sadly the public sector decision making is still made by who can shout more. Parliament for example need to lot more funding in research and data science...so they can make laws that are sound.
-
Soccer could do with some rule changes. Maybe award weighted points for things like how many times you miss and hit the post. As for analytics, this has been used for quite some time in American sports. I am surprised it's considered newsworthy in soccer.
-
Politics & law is so behind data anything and science anything. Indeed who can shout the loudest, find the most and most importantly, schmooze the most.
-
Politics & law is so behind data anything and science anything. Indeed who can shout the loudest, find the most and most importantly, schmooze the most.
Yeah. It’s a whole different ballgame. Though I would say election campaigns in the US are big on data. Law firms might find use for data on cases, judges and outcomes.