Nipate
Forum => Kenya Discussion => Topic started by: Omollo on August 21, 2017, 09:02:07 PM
-
I am available if anybody wants to know the people she is meeting.
One is the Vice-Chairman of Jubilee Party - which is a party to the petition.
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DHxNNw2XcAAAFwi.jpg)
-
Njoki is a lazy woman. How do you get to 290 pounds and not do something about it. Both her and Rachel omama are lazy obese cows .
-
Njoki ndungu must recuse herself from NASA petition. Kenyans should start calling and writing to supreme court requesting madam Njoki to sit out of this case.
NASA should start activating the base through prayer rallies across the country to fight back jubilee attempt to buy politicians.
-
At least we can all rest assured she won't be turning up dead in some ditch with torture marks on her arms just for cozying up to Jubilee folk. If only poor Msando was half as lucky.
-
At least we can all rest assured she won't be turning up dead in some ditch with torture marks on her arms just for cozying up to Jubilee folk. If only poor Msando was half as lucky.
That will never happen. Her and githongo parents are oligarchs. You touch them and they will be hell to pay
-
When was this photo taken?
-
When was this photo taken?
does it matter?
-
When was this photo taken?
does it matter?
Yes it does. What if it's 15yrs young?
Then again, who ELSE was in it?
I think an undated and incomplete image is not sufficient to cast aspersions on nobody.
That aside, I've heard a rumor of recusal paralyzing the petition. One too many recusal at SCOK induces paralysis and the petition is stillborn. I'd like to believe this was a reflex reaction to the weight of the petition, nothing serious
-
To be fair, I didn't need to see a picture to know how this particular judge would rule.
-
If a judge had sex with a litigant 40 years ago, it is not the time that passed by the fact that there is that link.
Unless you are being funny, you know that that is a recent photo of Njoki.
In any case, the association would simply be 15 years young.
Yes it does. What if it's 15yrs young?
Then again, who ELSE was in it?
I think an undated and incomplete image is not sufficient to cast aspersions on nobody.
That aside, I've heard a rumor of recusal paralyzing the petition. One too many recusal at SCOK induces paralysis and the petition is stillborn. I'd like to believe this was a reflex reaction to the weight of the petition, nothing serious
-
To be fair, I didn't need to see a picture to know how this particular judge would rule.
You're not suggesting that Njoks is not an objective judge are you?
-
To be fair, I didn't need to see a picture to know how this particular judge would rule.
You're not suggesting that Njoks is not an objective judge are you?
No. I am sure she can explain her decisions on the basis of purely legal merits. But I can also predict her decisions just by knowing her and, at the risk of upsetting kichwa, her tribe.
-
If a judge had sex with a litigant 40 years ago, it is not the time that passed by the fact that there is that link.
Unless you are being funny, you know that that is a recent photo of Njoki.
In any case, the association would simply be 15 years young.
Yes it does. What if it's 15yrs young?
Then again, who ELSE was in it?
I think an undated and incomplete image is not sufficient to cast aspersions on nobody.
That aside, I've heard a rumor of recusal paralyzing the petition. One too many recusal at SCOK induces paralysis and the petition is stillborn. I'd like to believe this was a reflex reaction to the weight of the petition, nothing serious
I aksd around. It was taken last year,and nobody is mildly embarrassed by it
-
1. That aside, I've heard a rumor of recusal paralyzing the petition. One too many recusal at SCOK induces paralysis and the petition is stillborn. I'd like to believe this was a reflex reaction to the weight of the petition, nothing serious
2.I aksd around. It was taken last year,and nobody is mildly embarrassed by it
1. Recusal: Unless three other judges recuse themselves, the quorum for the SCOK is 5. I have no idea what would happen in event of recusals. It may mean no case and there would no other court constitutionally mandated to hear the petition. In effect Jubilee would win.
2. Photo I am not aware of any time limit for any ground for recusal. Ndung'u is hit by two of the most common grounds: Ex parte communications with lawyers or non-lawyers and Relationship/ communication/ affinity with an interested party. She has to make her own decision to recuse herself as our lazy parliament has not found time to pass a robust public administration and management act to deal with such matters. However if she fails, it may become a disciplinary issue for consideration by the JSC
-
I think she should recluse herself for being close to Raila wife's Ida - who not only taught her but whom Njoki regard as mentor.
-
I think she should recluse herself for being close to Raila wife's Ida - who not only taught her but whom Njoki regard as mentor.
Pundit
A lion and a window met.
1. The Widow said of her just dead husband (they recovered only a piece of a bone): He was a good man!
2. The Lion after belching said: He was a good man, and belched some more
Those watching and listening were impressed by the "convergence" of opinion. Similarly I appreciate your "support" for the recusal of Njoki Ndung'u